CVE, singkatan dari Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, adalah daftar kerentanan keamanan komputer yang telah diungkapkan kepada publik.
OWASP
OWASP Top 10 adalah inisiatif yang mengidentifikasi dan mendokumentasikan 10 kerentanan keamanan teratas dalam aplikasi web.
CISA KEV
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) adalah inisiatif yang mengidentifikasi dan mempublikasikan daftar kerentanan yang diketahui telah dieksploitasi.
CPE, singkatan dari Common Platform Enumeration, adalah skema standar untuk penamaan perangkat keras, perangkat lunak, dan sistem operasi. CPE menyediakan skema penamaan terstruktur untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengklasifikasikan sistem teknologi informasi, platform, dan paket secara unik berdasarkan atribut tertentu seperti vendor, nama produk, versi, pembaruan, edisi, dan bahasa.
CWE, atau Common Weakness Enumeration, adalah daftar dan kategorisasi komprehensif tentang kelemahan dan kerentanan perangkat lunak. Ini berfungsi sebagai bahasa umum untuk mendeskripsikan kelemahan keamanan perangkat lunak dalam arsitektur, desain, kode, atau implementasi yang dapat menyebabkan kerentanan.
CAPEC, singkatan dari Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification, adalah sumber daya publik yang komprehensif yang mendokumentasikan pola serangan umum yang digunakan oleh penyerang dalam serangan siber. Basis pengetahuan ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan mengartikulasikan kerentanan umum dan metode yang digunakan penyerang untuk mengeksploitasinya.
Layanan & Harga
Bantuan & Info
Cari : CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendor atau kata kunci dalam CVE
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
seccomp: Move copy_seccomp() to no failure path.
Our syzbot instance reported memory leaks in do_seccomp() [0], similar
to the report [1]. It shows that we miss freeing struct seccomp_filter
and some objects included in it.
We can reproduce the issue with the program below [2] which calls one
seccomp() and two clone() syscalls.
The first clone()d child exits earlier than its parent and sends a
signal to kill it during the second clone(), more precisely before the
fatal_signal_pending() test in copy_process(). When the parent receives
the signal, it has to destroy the embryonic process and return -EINTR to
user space. In the failure path, we have to call seccomp_filter_release()
to decrement the filter's refcount.
Initially, we called it in free_task() called from the failure path, but
the commit 3a15fb6ed92c ("seccomp: release filter after task is fully
dead") moved it to release_task() to notify user space as early as possible
that the filter is no longer used.
To keep the change and current seccomp refcount semantics, let's move
copy_seccomp() just after the signal check and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() in
free_task() for future debugging.
[0]:
unreferenced object 0xffff8880063add00 (size 256):
comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.914s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
backtrace:
do_seccomp (./include/linux/slab.h:600 ./include/linux/slab.h:733 kernel/seccomp.c:666 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
unreferenced object 0xffffc90000035000 (size 4096):
comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
__vmalloc_node_range (mm/vmalloc.c:3226)
__vmalloc_node (mm/vmalloc.c:3261 (discriminator 4))
bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats (kernel/bpf/core.c:91)
bpf_prog_alloc (kernel/bpf/core.c:129)
bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1414)
do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
unreferenced object 0xffff888003fa1000 (size 1024):
comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats (./include/linux/slab.h:600 ./include/linux/slab.h:733 kernel/bpf/core.c:95)
bpf_prog_alloc (kernel/bpf/core.c:129)
bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1414)
do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
unreferenced object 0xffff888006360240 (size 16):
comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
01 00 37 00 76 65 72 6c e0 83 01 06 80 88 ff ff ..7.verl........
backtrace:
bpf_prog_store_orig_filter (net/core/filter.c:1137)
bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1428)
do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
unreferenced object 0xffff888
---truncated---
Informasi CVE
EPSS
EPSS adalah model penilaian yang memprediksi kemungkinan suatu kerentanan dieksploitasi.
Skor EPSS
Model EPSS menghasilkan skor probabilitas antara 0 dan 1 (0 hingga 100%). Semakin tinggi skor, semakin besar probabilitas bahwa suatu kerentanan akan dieksploitasi.
Tanggal
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2025-12-09
–
–
–
–
0.02%
2025-12-15
–
–
–
–
0.02%
2026-01-10
–
–
–
–
0.03%
2026-01-16
–
–
–
–
0.03%
2026-01-19
–
–
–
–
0.03%
2026-02-22
–
–
–
–
0.03%
2026-04-05
–
–
–
–
0.03%
2026-04-12
–
–
–
–
0.04%
2026-05-10
–
–
–
–
0.02%
2026-05-31
–
–
–
–
0.03%
Persentil EPSS
Persentil digunakan untuk meranking CVE berdasarkan skor EPSS mereka. Misalnya, CVE di persentil ke-95 berdasarkan skor EPSS-nya lebih mungkin dieksploitasi daripada 95% CVE lainnya. Dengan demikian, persentil digunakan untuk membandingkan skor EPSS suatu CVE dengan CVE lainnya.