CVE, singkatan dari Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, adalah daftar kerentanan keamanan komputer yang telah diungkapkan kepada publik.
OWASP
OWASP Top 10 adalah inisiatif yang mengidentifikasi dan mendokumentasikan 10 kerentanan keamanan teratas dalam aplikasi web.
CISA KEV
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) adalah inisiatif yang mengidentifikasi dan mempublikasikan daftar kerentanan yang diketahui telah dieksploitasi.
CPE, singkatan dari Common Platform Enumeration, adalah skema standar untuk penamaan perangkat keras, perangkat lunak, dan sistem operasi. CPE menyediakan skema penamaan terstruktur untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengklasifikasikan sistem teknologi informasi, platform, dan paket secara unik berdasarkan atribut tertentu seperti vendor, nama produk, versi, pembaruan, edisi, dan bahasa.
CWE, atau Common Weakness Enumeration, adalah daftar dan kategorisasi komprehensif tentang kelemahan dan kerentanan perangkat lunak. Ini berfungsi sebagai bahasa umum untuk mendeskripsikan kelemahan keamanan perangkat lunak dalam arsitektur, desain, kode, atau implementasi yang dapat menyebabkan kerentanan.
CAPEC, singkatan dari Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification, adalah sumber daya publik yang komprehensif yang mendokumentasikan pola serangan umum yang digunakan oleh penyerang dalam serangan siber. Basis pengetahuan ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan mengartikulasikan kerentanan umum dan metode yang digunakan penyerang untuk mengeksploitasinya.
Layanan & Harga
Bantuan & Info
Cari : CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendor atau kata kunci dalam CVE
btrfs: fix assertion of exclop condition when starting balance
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix assertion of exclop condition when starting balance
Balance as exclusive state is compatible with paused balance and device
add, which makes some things more complicated. The assertion of valid
states when starting from paused balance needs to take into account two
more states, the combinations can be hit when there are several threads
racing to start balance and device add. This won't typically happen when
the commands are started from command line.
Scenario 1: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE.
Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_finish executed finishes before assertion in
btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to
BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE state which lead to assertion failed:
fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE ||
fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD,
in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:456
Call Trace:
btrfs_exclop_balance+0x13c/0x310
? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0
? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20
btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320
btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0
? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210
do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Scenario 2: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED.
Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and
btrfs_exclop_balance executed finish before the latter thread execute
assertion in btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to
BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED state which lead to assertion failed:
fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE ||
fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD ||
fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE,
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:458
Call Trace:
btrfs_exclop_balance+0x240/0x410
? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0
? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20
btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320
btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0
? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210
do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
An example of the failed assertion is below, which shows that the
paused balance is also needed to be checked.
root@syzkaller:/home/xsk# ./repro
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.611428][ T7970] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 0
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.613973][ T7971] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.615456][ T7972] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.617528][ T7973] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.618359][ T7974] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.622589][ T7975] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.624034][ T7976] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.626420][ T7977] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.627643][ T7978] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14
[ 416.629006][ T7979] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
[ 416.630298][ T7980] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3
Fai
---truncated---
Informasi CVE
EPSS
EPSS adalah model penilaian yang memprediksi kemungkinan suatu kerentanan dieksploitasi.
Skor EPSS
Model EPSS menghasilkan skor probabilitas antara 0 dan 1 (0 hingga 100%). Semakin tinggi skor, semakin besar probabilitas bahwa suatu kerentanan akan dieksploitasi.
Tanggal
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2025-12-24
–
–
–
–
0.02%
2025-12-30
–
–
–
–
0.02%
2026-01-22
–
–
–
–
0.02%
2026-01-23
–
–
–
–
0.02%
2026-01-25
–
–
–
–
0.03%
2026-02-22
–
–
–
–
0.03%
2026-04-26
–
–
–
–
0.03%
2026-05-31
–
–
–
–
0.02%
2026-06-07
–
–
–
–
0.03%
Persentil EPSS
Persentil digunakan untuk meranking CVE berdasarkan skor EPSS mereka. Misalnya, CVE di persentil ke-95 berdasarkan skor EPSS-nya lebih mungkin dieksploitasi daripada 95% CVE lainnya. Dengan demikian, persentil digunakan untuk membandingkan skor EPSS suatu CVE dengan CVE lainnya.