CVE, singkatan dari Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, adalah daftar kerentanan keamanan komputer yang telah diungkapkan kepada publik.
OWASP
OWASP Top 10 adalah inisiatif yang mengidentifikasi dan mendokumentasikan 10 kerentanan keamanan teratas dalam aplikasi web.
CISA KEV
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) adalah inisiatif yang mengidentifikasi dan mempublikasikan daftar kerentanan yang diketahui telah dieksploitasi.
CPE, singkatan dari Common Platform Enumeration, adalah skema standar untuk penamaan perangkat keras, perangkat lunak, dan sistem operasi. CPE menyediakan skema penamaan terstruktur untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengklasifikasikan sistem teknologi informasi, platform, dan paket secara unik berdasarkan atribut tertentu seperti vendor, nama produk, versi, pembaruan, edisi, dan bahasa.
CWE, atau Common Weakness Enumeration, adalah daftar dan kategorisasi komprehensif tentang kelemahan dan kerentanan perangkat lunak. Ini berfungsi sebagai bahasa umum untuk mendeskripsikan kelemahan keamanan perangkat lunak dalam arsitektur, desain, kode, atau implementasi yang dapat menyebabkan kerentanan.
CAPEC, singkatan dari Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification, adalah sumber daya publik yang komprehensif yang mendokumentasikan pola serangan umum yang digunakan oleh penyerang dalam serangan siber. Basis pengetahuan ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan mengartikulasikan kerentanan umum dan metode yang digunakan penyerang untuk mengeksploitasinya.
Layanan & Harga
Bantuan & Info
Cari : CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendor atau kata kunci dalam CVE
net: openvswitch: remove never-working support for setting nsh fields
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: openvswitch: remove never-working support for setting nsh fields
The validation of the set(nsh(...)) action is completely wrong.
It runs through the nsh_key_put_from_nlattr() function that is the
same function that validates NSH keys for the flow match and the
push_nsh() action. However, the set(nsh(...)) has a very different
memory layout. Nested attributes in there are doubled in size in
case of the masked set(). That makes proper validation impossible.
There is also confusion in the code between the 'masked' flag, that
says that the nested attributes are doubled in size containing both
the value and the mask, and the 'is_mask' that says that the value
we're parsing is the mask. This is causing kernel crash on trying to
write into mask part of the match with SW_FLOW_KEY_PUT() during
validation, while validate_nsh() doesn't allocate any memory for it:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 1c2383067 P4D 1c2383067 PUD 20b703067 PMD 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 8 UID: 0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4+ #107 PREEMPT(voluntary)
RIP: 0010:nsh_key_put_from_nlattr+0x19d/0x610 [openvswitch]
Call Trace:
validate_nsh+0x60/0x90 [openvswitch]
validate_set.constprop.0+0x270/0x3c0 [openvswitch]
__ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x477/0x860 [openvswitch]
ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x8d/0x100 [openvswitch]
ovs_packet_cmd_execute+0x1cc/0x310 [openvswitch]
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xdb/0x130
genl_family_rcv_msg+0x14b/0x220
genl_rcv_msg+0x47/0xa0
netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100
genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
netlink_unicast+0x280/0x3b0
netlink_sendmsg+0x1f7/0x430
____sys_sendmsg+0x36b/0x3a0
___sys_sendmsg+0x87/0xd0
__sys_sendmsg+0x6d/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x2c0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The third issue with this process is that while trying to convert
the non-masked set into masked one, validate_set() copies and doubles
the size of the OVS_KEY_ATTR_NSH as if it didn't have any nested
attributes. It should be copying each nested attribute and doubling
them in size independently. And the process must be properly reversed
during the conversion back from masked to a non-masked variant during
the flow dump.
In the end, the only two outcomes of trying to use this action are
either validation failure or a kernel crash. And if somehow someone
manages to install a flow with such an action, it will most definitely
not do what it is supposed to, since all the keys and the masks are
mixed up.
Fixing all the issues is a complex task as it requires re-writing
most of the validation code.
Given that and the fact that this functionality never worked since
introduction, let's just remove it altogether. It's better to
re-introduce it later with a proper implementation instead of trying
to fix it in stable releases.
Informasi CVE
EPSS
EPSS adalah model penilaian yang memprediksi kemungkinan suatu kerentanan dieksploitasi.
Skor EPSS
Model EPSS menghasilkan skor probabilitas antara 0 dan 1 (0 hingga 100%). Semakin tinggi skor, semakin besar probabilitas bahwa suatu kerentanan akan dieksploitasi.
Tanggal
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2025-12-05
–
–
–
–
0.02%
2025-12-07
–
–
–
–
0.03%
2025-12-10
–
–
–
–
0.04%
2026-01-05
–
–
–
–
0.04%
2026-01-18
–
–
–
–
0.07%
2026-01-21
–
–
–
–
0.07%
2026-01-23
–
–
–
–
0.07%
2026-02-22
–
–
–
–
0.06%
2026-04-05
–
–
–
–
0.08%
2026-05-10
–
–
–
–
0.05%
2026-05-17
–
–
–
–
0.07%
2026-06-07
–
–
–
–
0.1%
Persentil EPSS
Persentil digunakan untuk meranking CVE berdasarkan skor EPSS mereka. Misalnya, CVE di persentil ke-95 berdasarkan skor EPSS-nya lebih mungkin dieksploitasi daripada 95% CVE lainnya. Dengan demikian, persentil digunakan untuk membandingkan skor EPSS suatu CVE dengan CVE lainnya.