CVE-2026-45297
0.04%V4
2026-05-28
18h16 +00:00
18h16 +00:00
Notifikasi untuk CVE tertentu
Tetap terinformasi tentang perubahan untuk CVE tertentu.
Deskripsi CVE
OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch. ProjectAuthorizer.__call__ (OSS api/auth/auth_project.py:14-38 and EE ee/api/auth/auth_project.py:14-46) only runs projects.is_authorized(project_id, tenant_id, user_id) + projects.get_project(tenant_id, project_id) when self.project_identifier == "projectId" (camelCase). For EE multi-tenant, feature-flag queries only filter on project_id, never tenant_id. Any authenticated user in tenant A can read/update/delete feature-flag rows belonging to tenant B by iterating the sequential integer project_id + feature_flag_id. OSS is single-tenant by design ({"errors":["tenants already registered"]} on second signup) so there's no cross-tenant impact This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0.
Informasi CVE
Kelemahan Terkait
| Nama Kelemahan | Sumber | |
|---|---|---|
| Improper Authorization The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. |
||
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. |
||
| Incorrect Authorization The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. |
EPSS
EPSS adalah model penilaian yang memprediksi kemungkinan suatu kerentanan dieksploitasi.
Skor EPSS
Model EPSS menghasilkan skor probabilitas antara 0 dan 1 (0 hingga 100%). Semakin tinggi skor, semakin besar probabilitas bahwa suatu kerentanan akan dieksploitasi.
Persentil EPSS
Persentil digunakan untuk meranking CVE berdasarkan skor EPSS mereka. Misalnya, CVE di persentil ke-95 berdasarkan skor EPSS-nya lebih mungkin dieksploitasi daripada 95% CVE lainnya. Dengan demikian, persentil digunakan untuk membandingkan skor EPSS suatu CVE dengan CVE lainnya.
