CVE-2011-0611 : Detail

CVE-2011-0611

8.8
/
Tinggi
93.48%V4
2011-04-13
14h00 +00:00
Network
2025-10-22
00h05 +00:00
Notifikasi untuk CVE tertentu
Tetap terinformasi tentang perubahan untuk CVE tertentu.
Kelola notifikasi

Deskripsi CVE

Adobe Flash Player before 10.2.154.27 on Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, and Solaris and 10.2.156.12 and earlier on Android; Adobe AIR before 2.6.19140; and Authplay.dll (aka AuthPlayLib.bundle) in Adobe Reader 9.x before 9.4.4 and 10.x through 10.0.1 on Windows, Adobe Reader 9.x before 9.4.4 and 10.x before 10.0.3 on Mac OS X, and Adobe Acrobat 9.x before 9.4.4 and 10.x before 10.0.3 on Windows and Mac OS X allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted Flash content; as demonstrated by a Microsoft Office document with an embedded .swf file that has a size inconsistency in a "group of included constants," object type confusion, ActionScript that adds custom functions to prototypes, and Date objects; and as exploited in the wild in April 2011.

Informasi CVE

Kelemahan Terkait

CWE-ID Nama Kelemahan Sumber
CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type
The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

Metrik

Metrik Skor Tingkat keparahan CVSS Vektor Sumber
V3.1 8.8 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

nvd@nist.gov
V2 9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C nvd@nist.gov

CISA KEV (Kerentanan yang Diketahui Dieksploitasi)

Nama kerentanan : Adobe Flash Player Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Tindakan yang diperlukan : The impacted product is end-of-life and should be disconnected if still in use.

Diketahui Digunakan dalam Kampanye Ransomware : Unknown

Ditambahkan : 2022-03-03 00h00 +00:00

Tindakan jatuh tempo : 2022-03-24 00h00 +00:00

Informasi penting
CVE ini diidentifikasi sebagai rentan dan menimbulkan ancaman aktif, menurut Katalog Kerentanan yang Diketahui Dieksploitasi (CISA KEV). CISA telah mencantumkan kerentanan ini sebagai yang secara aktif dieksploitasi oleh penjahat siber, menekankan pentingnya mengambil tindakan segera untuk mengatasi kelemahan ini. Sangat penting untuk memprioritaskan pembaruan dan remediasi CVE ini guna melindungi sistem dari potensi serangan siber.

EPSS

EPSS adalah model penilaian yang memprediksi kemungkinan suatu kerentanan dieksploitasi.

Skor EPSS

Model EPSS menghasilkan skor probabilitas antara 0 dan 1 (0 hingga 100%). Semakin tinggi skor, semakin besar probabilitas bahwa suatu kerentanan akan dieksploitasi.

Persentil EPSS

Persentil digunakan untuk meranking CVE berdasarkan skor EPSS mereka. Misalnya, CVE di persentil ke-95 berdasarkan skor EPSS-nya lebih mungkin dieksploitasi daripada 95% CVE lainnya. Dengan demikian, persentil digunakan untuk membandingkan skor EPSS suatu CVE dengan CVE lainnya.

Informasi eksploitasi

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 17473

Tanggal publikasi : 2011-07-02 22h00 +00:00
Penulis : Snake
Terverifikasi EDB : Yes

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 17175

Tanggal publikasi : 2011-04-15 22h00 +00:00
Penulis : Metasploit
Terverifikasi EDB : Yes

Produk yang Disebutkan

Konfigurasi 0

Adobe>>Flash_player >> Version Hingga (tidak termasuk) 10.2.154.27

Apple>>Mac_os_x >> Version -

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows >> Version -

Oracle>>Solaris >> Version -

Konfigurasi 0

Adobe>>Flash_player >> Version Hingga (termasuk) 10.2.156.12

Google>>Android >> Version -

Konfigurasi 0

Adobe>>Acrobat_reader >> Version Dari (termasuk) 9.0 Hingga (tidak termasuk) 9.4.4

Adobe>>Acrobat_reader >> Version Dari (termasuk) 10.0 Hingga (termasuk) 10.0.1

Microsoft>>Windows >> Version -

Konfigurasi 0

Adobe>>Adobe_air >> Version Hingga (tidak termasuk) 2.6.19140

Konfigurasi 0

Adobe>>Acrobat_reader >> Version Dari (termasuk) 9.0 Hingga (tidak termasuk) 9.4.4

Adobe>>Acrobat_reader >> Version Dari (termasuk) 10.0 Hingga (tidak termasuk) 10.0.3

Apple>>Mac_os_x >> Version -

Konfigurasi 0

Adobe>>Acrobat >> Version Dari (termasuk) 9.0 Hingga (tidak termasuk) 9.4

Adobe>>Acrobat >> Version Dari (termasuk) 10.0 Hingga (tidak termasuk) 10.0.3

Apple>>Mac_os_x >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows >> Version -

Konfigurasi 0

Google>>Chrome >> Version Hingga (tidak termasuk) 10.0.648.205

Apple>>Mac_os_x >> Version -

Google>>Chrome_os >> Version -

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows >> Version -

Konfigurasi 0

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 11.2

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 11.3

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 11.4

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_desktop >> Version 10

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_desktop >> Version 11

Referensi

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47314
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://secunia.com/blog/210/
Tags : x_refsource_MISC
http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8204
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SREASON
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0922
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0451.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8292
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SREASON
http://secunia.com/advisories/44149
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/44141
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0924
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025325
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/17175
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
http://secunia.com/advisories/44119
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/230057
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_CERT-VN
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0923
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025324
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK