CVE-2014-0160 : Dettaglio

CVE-2014-0160

7.5
/
Alto
Overflow
94.46%V4
Network
2014-04-07
00h00 +00:00
2025-10-22
00h05 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifiche per una CVE specifica
Rimani informato su qualsiasi modifica relativa a una CVE specifica.
Gestione notifiche

Descrizioni CVE

The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug.

Informazioni CVE

Vulnerabilità correlate

CWE-ID Nome della vulnerabilità Source
CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Metriche

Metriche Punteggio Gravità CVSS Vettore Source
V3.1 7.5 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 nvd@nist.gov
V2 5 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N nvd@nist.gov

CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities)

Nome della vulnerabilità : OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Azione richiesta : Apply updates per vendor instructions.

Utilizzata in campagne ransomware : Unknown

Aggiunta : 2022-05-04 00h00 +00:00

Scadenza dell'azione : 2022-05-25 00h00 +00:00

Informazione importante
Questa CVE è identificata come vulnerabile e rappresenta una minaccia attiva, secondo il Catalogo delle vulnerabilità sfruttate conosciute (CISA KEV). La CISA ha inserito questa vulnerabilità nell'elenco delle vulnerabilità attivamente sfruttate dai criminali informatici, sottolineando l'importanza di intervenire immediatamente per correggere questa falla. È fondamentale dare priorità all'aggiornamento e alla correzione di questa CVE per proteggere i sistemi da potenziali attacchi informatici.

EPSS

EPSS è un modello di punteggio che prevede la probabilità che una vulnerabilità venga sfruttata.

Punteggio EPSS

Il modello EPSS produce un punteggio di probabilità compreso tra 0 e 1 (da 0 a 100%). Più alto è il punteggio, maggiore è la probabilità che una vulnerabilità venga sfruttata.

Percentile EPSS

Il percentile viene utilizzato per classificare le CVE in base al loro punteggio EPSS. Ad esempio, una CVE al 95° percentile secondo il suo punteggio EPSS ha una probabilità maggiore di essere sfruttata rispetto al 95% delle altre CVE. Il percentile consente quindi di confrontare il punteggio EPSS di una CVE con quello delle altre.
EPSS First.org

Informazioni sull'exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 32764

Data di pubblicazione : 2014-04-08 22h00 +00:00
Autore : Fitzl Csaba
Verificato EDB : Yes

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 32791

Data di pubblicazione : 2014-04-09 22h00 +00:00
Autore : prdelka
Verificato EDB : Yes

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 32998

Data di pubblicazione : 2014-04-23 22h00 +00:00
Autore : Ayman Sagy
Verificato EDB : Yes

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 32745

Data di pubblicazione : 2014-04-07 22h00 +00:00
Autore : Jared Stafford
Verificato EDB : Yes

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Openssl>>Openssl >> Version From (including) 1.0.1 To (excluding) 1.0.1g

Configuraton 0

Filezilla-project>>Filezilla_server >> Version To (excluding) 0.9.44

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Application_processing_engine_firmware >> Version 2.0

Siemens>>Application_processing_engine >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Cp_1543-1_firmware >> Version 1.1

Siemens>>Cp_1543-1 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1500_firmware >> Version 1.5

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1500 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1500t_firmware >> Version 1.5

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1500t >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Elan-8.2 >> Version To (excluding) 8.3.3

Siemens>>Wincc_open_architecture >> Version 3.12

Configuraton 0

Intellian>>V100_firmware >> Version 1.20

Intellian>>V100_firmware >> Version 1.21

Intellian>>V100_firmware >> Version 1.24

Intellian>>V100 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Intellian>>V60_firmware >> Version 1.15

Intellian>>V60_firmware >> Version 1.25

Intellian>>V60 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 6.0

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.0

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.1

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.2

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.3

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.3.0.104

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.1.2.5

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.1.3.3

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.2.0.11

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.3.2.2

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.4.0.102

Configuraton 0

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 12.3

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 13.1

Configuraton 0

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 12.04

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 12.10

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 13.10

Configuraton 0

Fedoraproject>>Fedora >> Version 19

Fedoraproject>>Fedora >> Version 20

Configuraton 0

Redhat>>Gluster_storage >> Version 2.1

Redhat>>Storage >> Version 2.1

Redhat>>Virtualization >> Version 6.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_desktop >> Version 6.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server >> Version 6.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 6.5

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_eus >> Version 6.5

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_tus >> Version 6.5

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_workstation >> Version 6.0

Configuraton 0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 6.0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 7.0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 8.0

Configuraton 0

Ricon>>S9922l_firmware >> Version 16.10.3\(3794\)

Ricon>>S9922l >> Version 1.0

Configuraton 0

Broadcom>>Symantec_messaging_gateway >> Version 10.6.0

Broadcom>>Symantec_messaging_gateway >> Version 10.6.1

Configuraton 0

Splunk>>Splunk >> Version From (including) 6.0.0 To (excluding) 6.0.3

Riferimenti

http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/720951
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAMB3
Tags : Third Party Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57836
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57483
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://www.kerio.com/support/kerio-control/release-history
Tags : Broken Link, Third Party Advisory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084875
Tags : Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
http://heartbleed.com/
Tags : Third Party Advisory
http://www.f-secure.com/en/web/labs_global/fsc-2014-1
Tags : Broken Link, Third Party Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57347
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/59243
Tags : third-party-advisory
https://www.cert.fi/en/reports/2014/vulnerability788210.html
Tags : Not Applicable, Third Party Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57721
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57968
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140407.txt
Tags : Broken Link, Vendor Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/59139
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57966
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/59347
Tags : third-party-advisory
https://sku11army.blogspot.com/2020/01/heartbleed-hearts-continue-to-bleed.html
Tags : Exploit, Permissions Required, Third Party Advisory
Le informazioni presentate su CVE Find provengono da diverse fonti di riferimento attentamente selezionate. I dati CVE sono forniti da MITRE Corporation e dal National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Il catalogo delle vulnerabilità sfruttate conosciute (KEV) proviene dalla Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), mentre i punteggi EPSS provengono da FIRST.org. Inoltre, i dati relativi alle vulnerabilità software (CWE) e ai pattern di attacco comuni (CAPEC) sono mantenuti da MITRE Corporation, e le informazioni sulle configurazioni hardware e software (CPE) sono fornite da NVD.