CWE-273 Detail

CWE-273

Improper Check for Dropped Privileges
Medio
Incomplete
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
2023-06-29
00h00 +00:00
CWE Mitre.org
Notifiche per un CWE specifico
Rimani informato su qualsiasi modifica relativa a un CWE specifico.
Gestione notifiche

Nome: Improper Check for Dropped Privileges

The product attempts to drop privileges but does not check or incorrectly checks to see if the drop succeeded.

CWE Description

If the drop fails, the product will continue to run with the raised privileges, which might provide additional access to unprivileged users.

General Informations

Background Details

Modes Of Introduction

Implementation

Piattaforme applicabili

Linguaggio

Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

Conseguenze comuni

Ambito Impatto Probabilità
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity

Note: If privileges are not dropped, neither are access rights of the user. Often these rights can be prevented from being dropped.
Access Control
Non-Repudiation		Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Hide Activities

Note: If privileges are not dropped, in some cases the system may record actions as the user which is being impersonated rather than the impersonator.

Esempi osservati

Riferimenti Descrizione

CVE-2006-4447

Program does not check return value when invoking functions to drop privileges, which could leave users with higher privileges than expected by forcing those functions to fail.

CVE-2006-2916

Program does not check return value when invoking functions to drop privileges, which could leave users with higher privileges than expected by forcing those functions to fail.

Potential Mitigations

Phases : Architecture and Design
Phases : Implementation
Check the results of all functions that return a value and verify that the value is expected.
Phases : Implementation
In Windows, make sure that the process token has the SeImpersonatePrivilege(Microsoft Server 2003). Code that relies on impersonation for security must ensure that the impersonation succeeded, i.e., that a proper privilege demotion happened.

Detection Methods

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Effectiveness : High

Note sulla mappatura delle vulnerabilità

Giustificazione : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Commento : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Riferimenti

REF-18

The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf

Invio

Nome Organizzazione Data Data di rilascio Version
CLASP 2006-07-19 +00:00 2006-07-19 +00:00 Draft 3

Modifiche

Nome Organizzazione Data Commento
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Description, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-11-24 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-03-10 +00:00 updated Description, Name, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-05-27 +00:00 updated Name
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-10-30 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples, Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-06-23 +00:00 updated Background_Details, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Causal_Nature, Demonstrative_Examples, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-01-03 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-06-20 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated References, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-12-10 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
Le informazioni presentate su CVE Find provengono da diverse fonti di riferimento attentamente selezionate. I dati CVE sono forniti da MITRE Corporation e dal National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Il catalogo delle vulnerabilità sfruttate conosciute (KEV) proviene dalla Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), mentre i punteggi EPSS provengono da FIRST.org. Inoltre, i dati relativi alle vulnerabilità software (CWE) e ai pattern di attacco comuni (CAPEC) sono mantenuti da MITRE Corporation, e le informazioni sulle configurazioni hardware e software (CPE) sono fornite da NVD.