CWE-841 Detail

CWE-841

Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow
Incomplete
2011-03-30
00h00 +00:00
2025-12-11
00h00 +00:00
Notifiche per un CWE specifico
Rimani informato su qualsiasi modifica relativa a un CWE specifico.
Gestione notifiche

Nome: Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow

The product supports a session in which more than one behavior must be performed by an actor, but it does not properly ensure that the actor performs the behaviors in the required sequence.

General Informations

Modes Of Introduction

Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.

Piattaforme applicabili

Linguaggio

Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

Conseguenze comuni

Ambito Impatto Probabilità
OtherAlter Execution Logic

Note: An attacker could cause the product to skip critical steps or perform them in the wrong order, bypassing its intended business logic. This can sometimes have security implications.

Esempi osservati

Riferimenti Descrizione

CVE-2011-0348

Bypass of access/billing restrictions by sending traffic to an unrestricted destination before sending to a restricted destination.

CVE-2007-3012

Attacker can access portions of a restricted page by canceling out of a dialog.

CVE-2009-5056

Ticket-tracking system does not enforce a permission setting.

CVE-2004-2164

Shopping cart does not close a database connection when user restores a previous order, leading to connection exhaustion.

CVE-2003-0777

Chain: product does not properly handle dropped connections, leading to missing NULL terminator (CWE-170) and segmentation fault.

CVE-2005-3327

Chain: Authentication bypass by skipping the first startup step as required by the protocol.

CVE-2004-0829

Chain: File server crashes when sent a "find next" request without an initial "find first."

CVE-2010-2620

FTP server allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending (1) LIST, (2) RETR, (3) STOR, or other commands without performing the required login steps first.

CVE-2005-3296

FTP server allows remote attackers to list arbitrary directories as root by running the LIST command before logging in.

Detection Methods

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Note sulla mappatura delle vulnerabilità

Giustificazione : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Commento : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Note


Riferimenti

REF-795

Business Logic Flaws and Yahoo Games
Jeremiah Grossman.
https://blog.jeremiahgrossman.com/2006/12/business-logic-flaws.html

REF-796

Seven Business Logic Flaws That Put Your Website At Risk
Jeremiah Grossman.
https://docplayer.net/10021793-Seven-business-logic-flaws-that-put-your-website-at-risk.html

REF-797

Business Logic Flaws
WhiteHat Security.
https://web.archive.org/web/20080720171327/http://www.whitehatsec.com/home/solutions/BL_auction.html

REF-806

Insufficient Process Validation
WASC.
http://projects.webappsec.org/w/page/13246943/Insufficient-Process-Validation

REF-799

Defying Logic: Theory, Design, and Implementation of Complex Systems for Testing Application Logic
Rafal Los, Prajakta Jagdale.
https://www.slideshare.net/RafalLos/defying-logic-business-logic-testing-with-automation

REF-667

Real-Life Example of a 'Business Logic Defect' (Screen Shots!)
Rafal Los.
http://h30501.www3.hp.com/t5/Following-the-White-Rabbit-A/Real-Life-Example-of-a-Business-Logic-Defect-Screen-Shots/ba-p/22581

REF-801

Toward Automated Detection of Logic Vulnerabilities in Web Applications
Viktoria Felmetsger, Ludovico Cavedon, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna.
https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/sec10/tech/full_papers/Felmetsger.pdf

REF-802

Designing a Framework Method for Secure Business Application Logic Integrity in e-Commerce Systems
Faisal Nabi.
http://ijns.femto.com.tw/contents/ijns-v12-n1/ijns-2011-v12-n1-p29-41.pdf

Invio

Nome Organizzazione Data Data di rilascio Version
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-03-24 +00:00 2011-03-30 +00:00 1.12

Modifiche

Nome Organizzazione Data Commento
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-27 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2021-10-28 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2022-04-28 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Relationships, Type, Weakness_Ordinalities