CVE-2018-0296 : 詳細

CVE-2018-0296

7.5
/
高
94.4%V4
2018-06-07
12h00 +00:00
Directory Traversal
A03-InjectionA01-Broken Access Control
Network
2026-01-12
21h33 +00:00
特定のCVEの通知
特定のCVEの変更情報をいち早くお届けします。
通知を管理する

CVE の説明

A vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. It is also possible on certain software releases that the ASA will not reload, but an attacker could view sensitive system information without authentication by using directory traversal techniques. The vulnerability is due to lack of proper input validation of the HTTP URL. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition or unauthenticated disclosure of information. This vulnerability applies to IPv4 and IPv6 HTTP traffic. This vulnerability affects Cisco ASA Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliance (ISA), ASA 1000V Cloud Firewall, ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance (ASAv), Firepower 2100 Series Security Appliance, Firepower 4100 Series Security Appliance, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Module, FTD Virtual (FTDv). Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi16029.

CVE の情報

関連する弱点

CWE-ID 弱点名 出典
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

メトリクス

メトリクス スコア 深刻度 CVSS ベクター 出典
V3.1 7.5 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

nvd@nist.gov
V2 5 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P nvd@nist.gov

CISA KEV(既知の悪用された脆弱性)

脆弱性名 : Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Denial-of-Service Vulnerability

必要な対策 : Apply updates per vendor instructions.

ランサムウェアキャンペーンでの悪用が確認済み : Unknown

追加日 : 2021-11-03 00h00 +00:00

対応期限 : 2022-05-03 00h00 +00:00

重要な情報
このCVEはCISA KEV(既知の悪用された脆弱性カタログ)により、積極的に悪用されている脆弱性として認定されています。CISAはこの脆弱性がサイバー犯罪者によって活発に悪用されていると判断しており、早急な対応を推奨しています。潜在的なサイバー攻撃からシステムを保護するために、このCVEのアップデートと修正対応を優先してください。

EPSS

EPSSは脆弱性が悪用される可能性を予測するスコアリングモデルです。

EPSSスコア

EPSSモデルは0から1(0〜100%)の確率スコアを算出します。スコアが高いほど、脆弱性が悪用される可能性が高いことを示します。

EPSSパーセンタイル

パーセンタイルはCVEをEPSSスコアで順位付けするために使用されます。例えば、EPSSスコアで95パーセンタイルにあるCVEは、他の95%のCVEよりも悪用される可能性が高いことを意味します。パーセンタイルはCVEのEPSSスコアを他のCVEと比較するために使用されます。

エクスプロイト情報

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 44956

公開日 : 2018-06-27 22h00 +00:00
著者 : Yassine Aboukir
EDB検証済み : No

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 47220

公開日 : 2019-08-11 22h00 +00:00
著者 : Angelo Ruwantha
EDB検証済み : No

関連製品

構成 0

Cisco>>Adaptive_security_appliance_software >> Version ~から(含む) 9.1 ~まで(含まない) 9.1.7.29

Cisco>>Adaptive_security_appliance_software >> Version ~から(含む) 9.2 ~まで(含まない) 9.2.4.33

Cisco>>Adaptive_security_appliance_software >> Version ~から(含む) 9.3 ~まで(含まない) 9.4.4.18

Cisco>>Adaptive_security_appliance_software >> Version ~から(含む) 9.5 ~まで(含まない) 9.6.4.8

Cisco>>Adaptive_security_appliance_software >> Version ~から(含む) 9.7 ~まで(含まない) 9.7.1.24

Cisco>>Adaptive_security_appliance_software >> Version ~から(含む) 9.8 ~まで(含まない) 9.8.2.28

Cisco>>Adaptive_security_appliance_software >> Version ~から(含む) 9.9 ~まで(含まない) 9.9.2.1

構成 0

Cisco>>Firepower_threat_defense >> Version 6.2.3-85.02

Cisco>>Firepower_threat_defense >> Version 6.2.3-851

Cisco>>Secure_firewall_threat_defense >> Version ~から(含む) 6.0 ~まで(含まない) 6.1.0

Cisco>>Secure_firewall_threat_defense >> Version ~から(含む) 6.2.1 ~まで(含まない) 6.2.2.3

Cisco>>Secure_firewall_threat_defense >> Version 6.2.3

Cisco>>Secure_firewall_threat_defense >> Version 6.2.3.1

参考資料

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104612
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44956/
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041076
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK