CVE-2024-20280 : 詳細

CVE-2024-20280

6.3
/
中
0.09%V4
2024-10-16
16h15 +00:00
A02-Cryptographic FailuresA07-Identif. and Authent. Fail
Local
2024-10-31
14h13 +00:00
特定のCVEの通知
特定のCVEの変更情報をいち早くお届けします。
通知を管理する

CVE の説明

Cisco UCS Central Software Configuration Backup Static Key Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the backup feature of Cisco UCS Central Software could allow an attacker with access to a backup file to learn sensitive information that is stored in the full state and configuration backup files. This vulnerability is due to a weakness in the encryption method that is used for the backup function. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing a backup file and leveraging a static key that is used for the backup configuration feature. A successful exploit could allow an attacker with access to a backup file to learn sensitive information that is stored in full state backup files and configuration backup files, such as local user credentials, authentication server passwords, Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) community names, and the device SSL server certificate and key.

CVE の情報

関連する弱点

CWE-ID 弱点名 出典
CWE-321 Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key
The product uses a hard-coded, unchangeable cryptographic key.
CWE-798 Use of Hard-coded Credentials
The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key.

メトリクス

メトリクス スコア 深刻度 CVSS ベクター 出典
V3.1 6.3 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Changed

An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

EPSS

EPSSは脆弱性が悪用される可能性を予測するスコアリングモデルです。

EPSSスコア

EPSSモデルは0から1(0〜100%)の確率スコアを算出します。スコアが高いほど、脆弱性が悪用される可能性が高いことを示します。

EPSSパーセンタイル

パーセンタイルはCVEをEPSSスコアで順位付けするために使用されます。例えば、EPSSスコアで95パーセンタイルにあるCVEは、他の95%のCVEよりも悪用される可能性が高いことを意味します。パーセンタイルはCVEのEPSSスコアを他のCVEと比較するために使用されます。

関連製品

構成 0

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.0\(1a\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.1\(1a\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.1\(1b\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.1\(2a\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.2\(1a\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.2\(1d\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.2\(1e\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.2\(1f\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.3\(1a\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.3\(1b\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.3\(1c\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.4\(1a\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.4\(1b\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.4\(1c\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.5\(1a\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.5\(1b\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 1.5\(1c\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1a\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1b\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1c\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1d\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1e\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1f\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1g\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1h\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1i\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1j\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1k\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1l\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1m\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1n\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1o\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1p\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1q\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1r\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1s\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1t\)

Cisco>>Ucs_central_software >> Version 2.0\(1u\)

参考資料