CVE-2025-13601 : 詳細

CVE-2025-13601

7.7
/
高
0.01%V4
2025-11-26
14h44 +00:00
Local
2026-11-05
14h17 +00:00
特定のCVEの通知
特定のCVEの変更情報をいち早くお届けします。
通知を管理する

CVE の説明

Glib: integer overflow in in g_escape_uri_string()

A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string.

CVE の情報

関連する弱点

CWE-ID 弱点名 出典
CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

メトリクス

メトリクス スコア 深刻度 CVSS ベクター 出典
V3.1 7.7 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

EPSS

EPSSは脆弱性が悪用される可能性を予測するスコアリングモデルです。

EPSSスコア

EPSSモデルは0から1(0〜100%)の確率スコアを算出します。スコアが高いほど、脆弱性が悪用される可能性が高いことを示します。

EPSSパーセンタイル

パーセンタイルはCVEをEPSSスコアで順位付けするために使用されます。例えば、EPSSスコアで95パーセンタイルにあるCVEは、他の95%のCVEよりも悪用される可能性が高いことを意味します。パーセンタイルはCVEのEPSSスコアを他のCVEと比較するために使用されます。

関連製品

構成 0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder >> Version 9.0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 9.0_s390x

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_power_little_endian >> Version 9.0_ppc64le

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_x86_64 >> Version 9.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_arm_64 >> Version 9.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 9.0_s390x

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian >> Version 9.0_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64 >> Version 9.0

構成 0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_arm64 >> Version 10.0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 10.0_s390x

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_power_little_endian >> Version 10.0_ppc64le

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_x86_64 >> Version 10.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_arm_64 >> Version 10.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 10.0_s390x

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian >> Version 10.0_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64 >> Version 10.0

構成 0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_arm64 >> Version 8.0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 8.0_s390x

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_power_little_endian >> Version 8.0_ppc64le

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_x86_64 >> Version 8.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_arm_64 >> Version 8.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 8.0_s390x

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian >> Version 8.0_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64 >> Version 8.0

構成 0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_arm_64 >> Version 9.2

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 9.2_s390x

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian >> Version 9.2_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64 >> Version 9.2

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 9.2

構成 0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_arm64_eus >> Version 9.4

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 9.4_s390x

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_power_little_endian >> Version 9.4_ppc64le

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_x86_64 >> Version 9.4

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_arm_64 >> Version 9.4

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 9.4_s390x

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian >> Version 9.4_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64 >> Version 9.4

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64_eus >> Version 9.4

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 9.4

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian >> Version 9.4_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian_eus >> Version 9.4_ppc64le

構成 0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_arm64_eus >> Version 10.0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_ibm_z_systems_eus >> Version 10.0_s390x

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_power_little_endian_eus >> Version 10.0_ppc64le

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_x86_64_eus >> Version 10.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus >> Version 10.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_eus >> Version 10.0_s390x

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus >> Version 10.0_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64_eus >> Version 10.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian >> Version 10.0_ppc64le

構成 0

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_arm64 >> Version 9.6

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 9.6_s390x

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_power_little_endian >> Version 9.6_ppc64le

Redhat>>Codeready_linux_builder_for_x86_64 >> Version 9.6

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_arm_64 >> Version 9.6

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems >> Version 9.6_s390x

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian >> Version 9.6_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus >> Version 9.6_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64 >> Version 9.6

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64_eus >> Version 9.6

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 9.6

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian >> Version 9.6_ppc64le

構成 0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64 >> Version 8.6

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64_eus >> Version 8.6

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 8.6

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian >> Version 8.6_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_tus >> Version 8.6

構成 0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64 >> Version 8.8

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64_eus >> Version 8.8

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian >> Version 8.8_ppc64le

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_tus >> Version 8.8

構成 0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_for_x86_64_eus >> Version 8.4

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 8.4

構成 0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 8.2

構成 0

Redhat>>Ceph_storage >> Version 8.0

Redhat>>Discovery >> Version 2.0

構成 0

Gnome>>Glib >> Version ~まで(含まない) 2.86.3

構成 0

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform >> Version 4.12

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform >> Version 4.16

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform >> Version 4.17

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform >> Version 4.18

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform >> Version 4.19

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_arm64 >> Version 4.12

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_arm64 >> Version 4.16

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_arm64 >> Version 4.17

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_arm64 >> Version 4.18

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_arm64 >> Version 4.19

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_ibm_z >> Version 4.12

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_ibm_z >> Version 4.16

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_ibm_z >> Version 4.17

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_ibm_z >> Version 4.18

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_ibm_z >> Version 4.19

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_linuxone >> Version 4.12

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_linuxone >> Version 4.16

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_linuxone >> Version 4.17

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_linuxone >> Version 4.18

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_linuxone >> Version 4.19

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_power >> Version 4.12

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_power >> Version 4.16

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_power >> Version 4.17

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_power >> Version 4.18

Redhat>>Openshift_container_platform_for_power >> Version 4.19

参考資料

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0936
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0975
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0991
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1323
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1324
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1326
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1327
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1465
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1608
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1624
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1625
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1626
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1627
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1652
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1736
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:18344
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:18705
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2064
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2072
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2485
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2563
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2633
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2659
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2671
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2974
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3415
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4419
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7461
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13601
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2416741
Tags : issue-tracking, x_refsource_REDHAT