導入モード
Array :
It is common practice for products to be designed to
use default keys, passwords, or other mechanisms for
authentication. The rationale is to simplify the
manufacturing process or the system administrator's
task of installation and deployment into an
enterprise. However, this places the responsibility of
changing defaults onto the administrator.
適用可能なプラットフォーム
言語
クラス: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
オペレーティングシステム
クラス: Not OS-Specific (Undetermined)
アーキテクチャ
クラス: Not Architecture-Specific (Undetermined)
テクノロジー
クラス: ICS/OT (Undetermined)
クラス: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)
一般的な結果
| スコープ |
影響 |
可能性 |
| Authentication | Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
注記:If admins do not change the defaults, it is easier for
attackers to bypass authentication quickly across multiple
organizations. | |
観察された例
| 参考文献 |
説明 |
| Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) uses default credentials for some SSH accounts |
| data visualization/sharing package uses default secret keys or cookie values if they are not specified in environment variables |
| microcontroller board has default password, allowing admin access |
| cloud cluster management product has a default master encryption key |
| Intrusion Detection System (IDS) uses the same static, private SSL keys for multiple devices and installations, allowing decryption of SSL traffic |
潜在的な緩和策
Phases : Requirements
Prohibit use of default, hard-coded, or other values that do not vary for each installation of the product - especially for separate organizations.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Force the administrator to change the credential upon installation.
Phases : Installation // Operation
The product administrator could change the defaults upon installation or during operation.
脆弱性マッピングノート
理由 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
コメント : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
参考文献
REF-1283
OT:ICEFALL: The legacy of "insecure by design" and its implications for certifications and risk management
Forescout Vedere Labs.
https://www.forescout.com/resources/ot-icefall-report/
登録情報
| 名前 |
組織 |
日付 |
リリース日 |
Version |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2022-10-07 +00:00 |
2022-10-13 +00:00 |
4.9 |
変更履歴
| 名前 |
組織 |
日付 |
コメント |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2024-11-19 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Modes_of_Introduction, Time_of_Introduction |