導入モード
Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
適用可能なプラットフォーム
言語
クラス: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
一般的な結果
| スコープ |
影響 |
可能性 |
Other Access Control | Varies by Context, Bypass Protection Mechanism
注記:Given the deterministic nature of PRNGs, using the same seed for each initialization will lead to the same output in the same order. If an attacker can guess (or knows) the seed, then they may be able to determine the random numbers that will be produced from the PRNG. | |
観察された例
| 参考文献 |
説明 |
| SDK for JavaScript app builder for serverless code uses the same fixed seed for a PRNG, allowing cryptography bypass |
潜在的な緩和策
Phases : Architecture and Design
Do not reuse PRNG seeds. Consider a PRNG that periodically re-seeds itself as needed from a high quality pseudo-random output, such as hardware devices.
Phases : Architecture and Design // Requirements
Use products or modules that conform to FIPS 140-2 [REF-267] to avoid obvious entropy problems, or use the more recent FIPS 140-3 [REF-1192] if possible.
検出方法
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
有効性 : High
脆弱性マッピングノート
理由 : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
コメント : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
ノート
As of CWE 4.5, terminology related to randomness, entropy, and
predictability can vary widely. Within the developer and other
communities, "randomness" is used heavily. However, within
cryptography, "entropy" is distinct, typically implied as a
measurement. There are no commonly-used definitions, even within
standards documents and cryptography papers. Future versions of
CWE will attempt to define these terms and, if necessary,
distinguish between them in ways that are appropriate for
different communities but do not reduce the usability of CWE for
mapping, understanding, or other scenarios.
参考文献
REF-267
FIPS PUB 140-2: SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR CRYPTOGRAPHIC MODULES
Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
https://csrc.nist.gov/files/pubs/fips/140-2/upd2/final/docs/fips1402.pdf REF-1192
FIPS PUB 140-3: SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR CRYPTOGRAPHIC MODULES
Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/fips/140/3/final
登録情報
| 名前 |
組織 |
日付 |
リリース日 |
Version |
| PLOVER |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
変更履歴
| 名前 |
組織 |
日付 |
コメント |
| Sean Eidemiller |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
added/updated demonstrative examples |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-03-10 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-12-28 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-06-21 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-09-13 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations, References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Description, Modes_of_Introduction, Name, References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-06-20 +00:00 |
updated Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-07-20 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Maintenance_Notes, Modes_of_Introduction, Potential_Mitigations, References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-10-26 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-09-09 +00:00 |
updated References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description |