日本語

CWE-561 詳細

CWE-561

Dead Code
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
Draft
2026-10-28
00h00 +00:00
CWE Mitre.org
特定のCWEの通知
特定のCWEの変更情報をいち早くお届けします。
通知を管理する

名前: Dead Code

The product contains dead code, which can never be executed.

一般情報

導入モード

Implementation

適用可能なプラットフォーム

言語

クラス： Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

一般的な結果

スコープ 影響 可能性
OtherQuality Degradation

注記：Dead code that results from code that can never be executed is an indication of problems with the source code that needs to be fixed and is an indication of poor quality.
OtherReduce Maintainability
OtherVaries by Context, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

注記：In some cases, dead code can be reachable or exploitable by attackers after they exploit another weakness or vulnerability that can access the code. For example, some buffer overflow exploits could modify addresses to point to locations that contain dead code.

観察された例

参考文献 説明

CVE-2014-1266

Chain: incorrect "goto" in Apple SSL product bypasses certificate validation, allowing Adversary-in-the-Middle (AITM) attack (Apple "goto fail" bug). CWE-705 (Incorrect Control Flow Scoping) -> CWE-561 (Dead Code) -> CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation) -> CWE-393 (Return of Wrong Status Code) -> CWE-300 (Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint). The code's whitespace indentation did not reflect the actual control flow (CWE-1114) and did not explicitly delimit the block (CWE-483), which could have made it more difficult for human code auditors to detect the vulnerability.

潜在的な緩和策

Phases : Implementation
Remove dead code before deploying the application.

検出方法

Architecture or Design Review

有効性 : High

Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode

有効性 : High

Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation

有効性 : SOAR Partial

Automated Static Analysis

有効性 : SOAR Partial

Automated Static Analysis - Source Code

有効性 : High

Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation

有効性 : SOAR Partial

Manual Static Analysis - Source Code

有効性 : High

脆弱性マッピングノート

理由 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities. However, the term "dead code" might have multiple interpretations.
コメント : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

ノート



参考文献

REF-960

Automated Source Code Maintainability Measure (ASCMM)
Object Management Group (OMG).
https://www.omg.org/spec/ASCMM/

REF-1479

State-of-the-Art Resources (SOAR) for Software Vulnerability Detection, Test, and Evaluation
Gregory Larsen, E. Kenneth Hong Fong, David A. Wheeler, Rama S. Moorthy.
https://www.ida.org/-/media/feature/publications/s/st/stateoftheart-resources-soar-for-software-vulnerability-detection-test-and-evaluation/p-5061.ashx

REF-1534

Automated Technical Debt Measure, Version 2
OMG.
https://www.omg.org/spec/ATDM2/1.0/PDF

登録情報

名前 組織 日付 リリース日 Version
Anonymous Tool Vendor (under NDA) 2006-07-19 +00:00 2006-07-19 +00:00 Draft 3

変更履歴

名前 組織 日付 コメント
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Description, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-11-24 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-05-27 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-07-27 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-10-29 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Other_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-09-13 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-10-30 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-06-23 +00:00 updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Detection_Factors, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-01-03 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-06-20 +00:00 updated Type
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-08-20 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2021-03-15 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2021-07-20 +00:00 updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2024-02-29 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-09-09 +00:00 updated Detection_Factors, References
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-04-30 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-10-28 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Description, Mapping_Notes, References, Relationships, Technical_Nuance, Terminology_Notes
CVE Findに掲載されている情報は、慎重に選定された複数の参照ソースから取得されています。CVEデータはMITRE Corporationおよび国家脆弱性データベース（NVD）が提供しています。既知の悪用された脆弱性（KEV）カタログはサイバーセキュリティ・インフラセキュリティ庁（CISA）から、EPSSスコアはFIRST.orgから取得しています。また、ソフトウェアの弱点（CWE）および共通攻撃パターン（CAPEC）に関するデータはMITRE Corporationが管理し、ハードウェアおよびソフトウェア構成（CPE）に関する情報はNVDが提供しています。