導入モード
Architecture and Design : COMMISSION: This weakness refers to an incorrect design related to an architectural security tactic.
Implementation
適用可能なプラットフォーム
言語
名前: SQL (Often)
テクノロジー
名前: Database Server (Often)
一般的な結果
| スコープ |
影響 |
可能性 |
Confidentiality Integrity Access Control | Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, Bypass Protection Mechanism
注記:When a user can set a primary key to any value, then the user can modify the key to point to unauthorized records. | |
潜在的な緩和策
Phases : Implementation
Modify the query to include a clause that
performs an authorization check, or otherwise ensure
that the check is performed before the query is
executed.
Phases : Implementation
Assume all input is malicious. Use a standard input validation mechanism to validate all input for length, type, syntax, and business rules before accepting the data. Use an "accept known good" validation strategy.
Phases : Implementation
Use a parameterized query AND make sure that the accepted values conform to the business rules. Construct your SQL statement accordingly.
検出方法
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
有効性 : High
脆弱性マッピングノート
理由 : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
コメント : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
登録情報
| 名前 |
組織 |
日付 |
リリース日 |
Version |
| Anonymous Tool Vendor (under NDA) |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
変更履歴
| 名前 |
組織 |
日付 |
コメント |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-07-27 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-06-21 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-03-29 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Name |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2024-02-29 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-04-03 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Modes_of_Introduction, Potential_Mitigations |