導入モード
Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
Operation
適用可能なプラットフォーム
言語
クラス: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
テクノロジー
名前: Web Server (Undetermined)
一般的な結果
| スコープ |
影響 |
可能性 |
| Access Control | Bypass Protection Mechanism
注記:This can allow a non-canonical URL to bypass the authorization. An attacker may be able to bypass the authorization mechanism to gain access to the otherwise-protected URL. | |
| Confidentiality | Read Files or Directories
注記:If a non-canonical URL is used, the server may choose to return the contents of the file, instead of pre-processing the file (e.g. as a program). | |
潜在的な緩和策
Phases : Architecture and Design
Make access control policy based on path information in canonical form, with all alternate encodings rejected (which can be accomplished by a default deny rule). Consider very restrictive regular expressions to validate that the path is in the expected form. Reject all alternate path encodings that are not in the expected canonical form.
検出方法
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
有効性 : High
脆弱性マッピングノート
理由 : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
コメント : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
登録情報
| 名前 |
組織 |
日付 |
リリース日 |
Version |
| Evgeny Lebanidze |
Cigital |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
Draft 8 |
変更履歴
| 名前 |
組織 |
日付 |
コメント |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-10-14 +00:00 |
updated Description, Name, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-12-13 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-03-29 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Enabling_Factors_for_Exploitation, Modes_of_Introduction, Observed_Examples, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Potential_Mitigations |