CWE-705
Incorrect Control Flow Scoping
2008-09-09
00h00 +00:00
00h00 +00:00
特定のCWEの通知
特定のCWEの変更情報をいち早くお届けします。
名前: Incorrect Control Flow Scoping
The product does not properly return control flow to the proper location after it has completed a task or detected an unusual condition.
一般情報
導入モード
Implementation適用可能なプラットフォーム
言語
クラス： Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)一般的な結果
| スコープ | 影響 | 可能性 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | Alter Execution Logic, Other |
観察された例
| 参考文献 | 説明 |
|---|---|
CVE-2023-21087 | Java code in a smartphone OS can encounter a "boot loop" due to an uncaught exception |
CVE-2014-1266 | Chain: incorrect "goto" in Apple SSL product bypasses certificate validation, allowing Adversary-in-the-Middle (AITM) attack (Apple "goto fail" bug). CWE-705 (Incorrect Control Flow Scoping) -> CWE-561 (Dead Code) -> CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation) -> CWE-393 (Return of Wrong Status Code) -> CWE-300 (Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint). The code's whitespace indentation did not reflect the actual control flow (CWE-1114) and did not explicitly delimit the block (CWE-483), which could have made it more difficult for human code auditors to detect the vulnerability. |
検出方法
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)脆弱性マッピングノート
理由 : This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriateコメント : Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit
登録情報
| 名前 | 組織 | 日付 | リリース日 | Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | 1.0 |
変更履歴
| 名前 | 組織 | 日付 | コメント |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Dalci | Cigital | updated Time_of_Introduction | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Observed_Examples | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Observed_Examples, Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Observed_Examples | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Description | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Time_of_Introduction | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Mapping_Notes | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships |
