CVE-2023-54219
12h11 +00:00
CVE 설명
Revert "IB/isert: Fix incorrect release of isert connection"
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Revert "IB/isert: Fix incorrect release of isert connection" Commit: 699826f4e30a ("IB/isert: Fix incorrect release of isert connection") is causing problems on OPA when DEVICE_REMOVAL is happening. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 52 PID: 2117247 at drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c:359 ib_cq_pool_cleanup+0xac/0xb0 [ib_core] Modules linked in: nfsd nfs_acl target_core_user uio tcm_fc libfc scsi_transport_fc tcm_loop target_core_pscsi target_core_iblock target_core_file rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace fscache netfs rfkill rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_srpt sunrpc ib_isert iscsi_target_mod target_core_mod opa_vnic ib_iser libiscsi ib_umad scsi_transport_iscsi rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm hfi1(-) rdmavt ib_uverbs intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common sb_edac ib_core x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp i2c_i801 mxm_wmi rapl iTCO_wdt ipmi_si iTCO_vendor_support mei_me ipmi_devintf mei intel_cstate ioatdma intel_uncore i2c_smbus joydev pcspkr lpc_ich ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad xfs libcrc32c sr_mod sd_mod cdrom t10_pi sg crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel drm_kms_helper drm_shmem_helper ahci libahci ghash_clmulni_intel igb drm libata dca i2c_algo_bit wmi fuse CPU: 52 PID: 2117247 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1+ #1 Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600CWR/S2600CW, BIOS SE5C610.86B.01.01.0014.121820151719 12/18/2015 RIP: 0010:ib_cq_pool_cleanup+0xac/0xb0 [ib_core] Code: ff 48 8b 43 40 48 8d 7b 40 48 83 e8 40 4c 39 e7 75 b3 49 83 c4 10 4d 39 fc 75 94 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc <0f> 0b eb a1 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 0f 1f RSP: 0018:ffffc10bea13fc80 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 000000000000010c RBX: ffff9bf5c7e66c00 RCX: 000000008020001d RDX: 000000008020001e RSI: fffff175221f9900 RDI: ffff9bf5c7e67640 RBP: ffff9bf5c7e67600 R08: ffff9bf5c7e64400 R09: 000000008020001d R10: 0000000040000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9bee4b1e8a18 R13: dead000000000122 R14: dead000000000100 R15: ffff9bee4b1e8a38 FS: 00007ff1e6d38740(0000) GS:ffff9bfd9fb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005652044ecc68 CR3: 0000000889b5c005 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace:CVE 정보
메트릭
| 메트릭 | 점수 | 심각도 | CVSS 벡터 | 출처 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V3.1 | 7.5 | HIGH |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
추가 정보
Base: Exploitabilty MetricsThe Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. Network The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers). Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Low Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. None The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. None The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope MetricsThe Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. Unchanged An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Base: Impact MetricsThe Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. None There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. None There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal MetricsThe Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental MetricsThese metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. |
