취약점 도입 방식
Implementation
적용 가능한 플랫폼
언어
클래스: Memory-Unsafe (Undetermined)
이름: C (Undetermined)
이름: C++ (Undetermined)
일반적인 결과
| 범위 |
영향 |
가능성 |
| Confidentiality | Read Memory | |
| Confidentiality | Bypass Protection Mechanism
참고: By reading out-of-bounds memory, an attacker might be able to get secret values, such as memory addresses, which can bypass protection mechanisms such as ASLR in order to improve the reliability and likelihood of exploiting a separate weakness to achieve code execution instead of just denial of service. | |
Availability Integrity | DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
참고: An attacker might be able to cause a crash or other denial of service by causing the product to read a memory location that is not allowed (such as a segmentation fault), or to cause other conditions in which the read operation returns more data than is expected. | |
관찰된 예시
| 참고 자료 |
설명 |
| Out-of-bounds read in audio processor used in a common web browser, allowing a read of the global data section |
| Text editor has out-of-bounds read past end of line while indenting C code |
| Chain: "Heartbleed" bug receives an inconsistent length parameter (CWE-130) enabling an out-of-bounds read (CWE-126), returning memory that could include private cryptographic keys and other sensitive data. |
| Chain: product does not handle when an input string is not NULL terminated, leading to buffer over-read or heap-based buffer overflow. |
탐지 방법
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
효과성 : High
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Use tools that are integrated during
compilation to insert runtime error-checking mechanisms
related to memory safety errors, such as AddressSanitizer
(ASan) for C/C++ [REF-1518].
효과성 : Moderate
취약점 매핑 메모
근거 : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
메모
These problems may be resultant from missing sentinel values (CWE-463) or trusting a user-influenced input length variable.
A buffer over-read typically occurs when the pointer or its index is incremented to a position past the end of the buffer or when pointer arithmetic results in a position after the valid memory location.
참고 자료
REF-1034
Breaking the memory secrecy assumption
Raoul Strackx, Yves Younan, Pieter Philippaerts, Frank Piessens, Sven Lachmund, Thomas Walter.
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1519144.1519145 REF-1035
The info leak era on software exploitation
Fermin J. Serna.
https://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-12/Briefings/Serna/BH_US_12_Serna_Leak_Era_Slides.pdf REF-44
24 Deadly Sins of Software Security
Michael Howard, David LeBlanc, John Viega.
REF-1518
AddressSanitizer
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html
제출
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
출시일 |
Version |
| PLOVER |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
수정 사항
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
댓글 |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Description, Relationship_Notes, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-03-29 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-06-23 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Causal_Nature, Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2018-03-27 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-09-19 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-06-25 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-10-26 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-04-03 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Other_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-09-09 +00:00 |
updated Affected_Resources, Common_Consequences, Demonstrative_Examples, Functional_Areas |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, Relationships |