배경 세부 정보
취약점 도입 방식
Architecture and Design : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
적용 가능한 플랫폼
언어
클래스: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
일반적인 결과
| 범위 |
영향 |
가능성 |
| Access Control | Bypass Protection Mechanism, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
참고: Potentially a replay attack, in which an attacker could send the same data twice, could be crafted if nonces are allowed to be reused. This could allow a user to send a message which masquerades as a valid message from a valid user. | |
관찰된 예시
| 참고 자료 |
설명 |
| social networking app reuses a nonce/key pair, allowing MITM attackers to manipulate direct messages |
| Rust package reuses a nonce/key pair when an object is cloned, which resets the random number generation |
잠재적 완화 방법
Phases : Implementation
Refuse to reuse nonce values.
Phases : Implementation
Use techniques such as requiring incrementing, time based and/or challenge response to assure uniqueness of nonces.
탐지 방법
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
취약점 매핑 메모
근거 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
참고 자료
REF-18
The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
제출
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
출시일 |
Version |
| CLASP |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
수정 사항
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
댓글 |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Background_Details, Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-06-20 +00:00 |
updated Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-04-30 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |