이름: Incorrect Usage of Seeds in Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG)

The product uses a Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG) but does not correctly manage seeds.

일반 정보

취약점 도입 방식

Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.

적용 가능한 플랫폼

언어

클래스: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

일반적인 결과

범위	영향	가능성
Access Control Other	Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other 참고: If a PRNG is used incorrectly, such as using the same seed for each initialization or using a predictable seed, then an attacker may be able to easily guess the seed and thus the random numbers. This could lead to unauthorized access to a system if the seed is used for authentication and authorization.

관찰된 예시

참고 자료	설명
CVE-2020-7010	Cloud application on Kubernetes generates passwords using a weak random number generator based on deployment time.
CVE-2019-11495	server uses erlang:now() to seed the PRNG, which results in a small search space for potential random seeds
CVE-2018-12520	Product's PRNG is not seeded for the generation of session IDs
CVE-2016-10180	Router's PIN generation is based on rand(time(0)) seeding.

탐지 방법

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

취약점 매핑 메모

근거 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

메모

As of CWE 4.5, terminology related to randomness, entropy, and predictability can vary widely. Within the developer and other communities, "randomness" is used heavily. However, within cryptography, "entropy" is distinct, typically implied as a measurement. There are no commonly-used definitions, even within standards documents and cryptography papers. Future versions of CWE will attempt to define these terms and, if necessary, distinguish between them in ways that are appropriate for different communities but do not reduce the usability of CWE for mapping, understanding, or other scenarios.

참고 자료

REF-44

24 Deadly Sins of Software Security
Michael Howard, David LeBlanc, John Viega.

제출

이름	조직	날짜	출시일	Version
PLOVER		2006-07-19 +00:00	2006-07-19 +00:00	Draft 3

수정 사항

이름	조직	날짜	댓글
Eric Dalci	Cigital	2008-07-01 +00:00	updated Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2008-09-08 +00:00	updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-06-01 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2012-05-11 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences, References, Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2017-11-08 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms, Description, Modes_of_Introduction, Name, Relationships, Type
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2019-06-20 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-02-24 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2021-07-20 +00:00	updated Description, Maintenance_Notes, Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2021-10-28 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2022-10-13 +00:00	updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-01-31 +00:00	updated Description
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-04-27 +00:00	updated Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-06-29 +00:00	updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-10-26 +00:00	updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2025-12-11 +00:00	updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities

CWE-335 상세 정보

CWE-335