CWE-342 상세 정보

CWE-342

Predictable Exact Value from Previous Values
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
Draft
2025-12-11
00h00 +00:00
특정 CWE 알림
특정 CWE의 변경 사항에 대한 정보를 받아보세요.
알림 관리

이름: Predictable Exact Value from Previous Values

An exact value or random number can be precisely predicted by observing previous values.

일반 정보

취약점 도입 방식

Architecture and Design
Implementation

적용 가능한 플랫폼

언어

클래스: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

일반적인 결과

범위 영향 가능성
OtherVaries by Context

관찰된 예시

참고 자료 설명

CVE-2002-1463

Firewall generates easily predictable initial sequence numbers (ISN), which allows remote attackers to spoof connections.

CVE-1999-0074

Listening TCP ports are sequentially allocated, allowing spoofing attacks.

CVE-1999-0077

Predictable TCP sequence numbers allow spoofing.

CVE-2000-0335

DNS resolver uses predictable IDs, allowing a local user to spoof DNS query results.

잠재적 완화 방법

Increase the entropy used to seed a PRNG.
Phases : Architecture and Design // Requirements
Use products or modules that conform to FIPS 140-2 [REF-267] to avoid obvious entropy problems. Consult FIPS 140-2 Annex C ("Approved Random Number Generators").
Phases : Implementation
Use a PRNG that periodically re-seeds itself using input from high-quality sources, such as hardware devices with high entropy. However, do not re-seed too frequently, or else the entropy source might block.

취약점 매핑 메모

근거 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

메모

As of CWE 4.5, terminology related to randomness, entropy, and predictability can vary widely. Within the developer and other communities, "randomness" is used heavily. However, within cryptography, "entropy" is distinct, typically implied as a measurement. There are no commonly-used definitions, even within standards documents and cryptography papers. Future versions of CWE will attempt to define these terms and, if necessary, distinguish between them in ways that are appropriate for different communities but do not reduce the usability of CWE for mapping, understanding, or other scenarios.

참고 자료

REF-267

FIPS PUB 140-2: SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR CRYPTOGRAPHIC MODULES
Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
https://csrc.nist.gov/files/pubs/fips/140-2/upd2/final/docs/fips1402.pdf

REF-44

24 Deadly Sins of Software Security
Michael Howard, David LeBlanc, John Viega.

제출

이름 조직 날짜 출시일 Version
PLOVER 2006-07-19 +00:00 2006-07-19 +00:00 Draft 3

수정 사항

이름 조직 날짜 댓글
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-03-10 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-12-28 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2010-06-21 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-27 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-09-13 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations, References
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Observed_Examples, References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-10-30 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, References
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2021-07-20 +00:00 updated Maintenance_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-09-09 +00:00 updated References
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities