취약점 도입 방식
Implementation
적용 가능한 플랫폼
언어
클래스: Object-Oriented (Undetermined)
이름: C++ (Undetermined)
이름: Java (Undetermined)
이름: C# (Undetermined)
일반적인 결과
| 범위 |
영향 |
가능성 |
Access Control Confidentiality | Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
참고: A class that does not explicitly deny cloning can be cloned by any other class without running the constructor. Cloneable classes are effectively open classes, since data cannot be hidden in the. This is also dangerous since the constructor may perform security-related checks. By allowing the object to be cloned, those checks may be bypassed. | |
잠재적 완화 방법
Phases : Implementation
If you do make your classes clonable, ensure that your clone method is final and throw super.clone().
탐지 방법
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
취약점 매핑 메모
근거 : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
참고 자료
REF-18
The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
제출
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
출시일 |
Version |
| CLASP |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
수정 사항
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
댓글 |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Description, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-10-14 +00:00 |
updated Other_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-03-29 +00:00 |
updated Name |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-03-15 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description |