배경 세부 정보
취약점 도입 방식
Implementation
적용 가능한 플랫폼
언어
이름: C++ (Undetermined)
이름: Java (Undetermined)
일반적인 결과
| 범위 |
영향 |
가능성 |
| Integrity | Modify Application Data
참고: The object could potentially be tampered with in unexpected ways. Public static variables can be read without an accessor and changed without a mutator by any classes in the application. | |
| Confidentiality | Read Application Data
참고: The object could potentially allow the object to be read. | |
잠재적 완화 방법
Phases : Architecture and Design
Clearly identify the scope for all critical data elements, including whether they should be regarded as static.
Phases : Implementation
탐지 방법
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
효과성 : High
취약점 매핑 메모
근거 : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
참고 자료
REF-18
The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
제출
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
출시일 |
Version |
| CLASP |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
수정 사항
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
댓글 |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
|
KDM Analytics |
2008-08-01 +00:00 |
added/updated white box definitions |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-11-05 +00:00 |
Significant clarification of this entry, and improved examples. |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-11-24 +00:00 |
updated Background_Details, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Name, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated White_Box_Definitions |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description |