취약점 도입 방식
Architecture and Design : COMMISSION: This weakness refers to an incorrect design related to an architectural security tactic.
Implementation
적용 가능한 플랫폼
언어
이름: SQL (Often)
기술
이름: Database Server (Often)
일반적인 결과
| 범위 |
영향 |
가능성 |
Confidentiality Integrity Access Control | Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, Bypass Protection Mechanism
참고: When a user can set a primary key to any value, then the user can modify the key to point to unauthorized records. | |
잠재적 완화 방법
Phases : Implementation
Modify the query to include a clause that
performs an authorization check, or otherwise ensure
that the check is performed before the query is
executed.
Phases : Implementation
Assume all input is malicious. Use a standard input validation mechanism to validate all input for length, type, syntax, and business rules before accepting the data. Use an "accept known good" validation strategy.
Phases : Implementation
Use a parameterized query AND make sure that the accepted values conform to the business rules. Construct your SQL statement accordingly.
탐지 방법
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
효과성 : High
취약점 매핑 메모
근거 : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
제출
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
출시일 |
Version |
| Anonymous Tool Vendor (under NDA) |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
수정 사항
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
댓글 |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-07-27 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-06-21 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-03-29 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Name |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2024-02-29 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-04-03 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Modes_of_Introduction, Potential_Mitigations |