취약점 도입 방식
Implementation
적용 가능한 플랫폼
언어
클래스: Memory-Unsafe (Undetermined)
이름: C (Undetermined)
일반적인 결과
| 범위 |
영향 |
가능성 |
Integrity Confidentiality Availability | Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Modify Memory
참고: When free() is called on an invalid pointer, the program's memory management data structures may become corrupted. This corruption can cause the program to crash or, in some circumstances, an attacker may be able to cause free() to operate on controllable memory locations to modify critical program variables or execute code. There is the potential for arbitrary code execution with privileges of the vulnerable program via a "write, what where" primitive. If pointers to memory that hold user information are freed, a malicious user may be able to write 4 bytes anywhere in memory. | |
관찰된 예시
| 참고 자료 |
설명 |
| parser for a word processor attempts to free a stack pointer when intending to expand memory to hold a larger buffer |
잠재적 완화 방법
Phases : Implementation
Only free pointers that you have called malloc on previously. This is the recommended solution. Keep track of which pointers point at the beginning of valid chunks and free them only once.
Phases : Implementation
Before freeing a pointer, the programmer should make sure that the pointer was previously allocated on the heap and that the memory belongs to the programmer. Freeing an unallocated pointer will cause undefined behavior in the program.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Phases : Architecture and Design
Use a language that provides abstractions for memory allocation and deallocation.
탐지 방법
Fuzzing
Fuzz testing (fuzzing) is a powerful technique for generating large numbers of diverse inputs - either randomly or algorithmically - and dynamically invoking the code with those inputs. Even with random inputs, it is often capable of generating unexpected results such as crashes, memory corruption, or resource consumption. Fuzzing effectively produces repeatable test cases that clearly indicate bugs, which helps developers to diagnose the issues.
효과성 : High
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
효과성 : High
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Use tools that are integrated during
compilation to insert runtime error-checking mechanisms
related to memory safety errors, such as AddressSanitizer
(ASan) for C/C++ [REF-1518] or valgrind [REF-480].
효과성 : Moderate
취약점 매핑 메모
근거 : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
메모
In C++, if the new operator was used to allocate the memory, it may be allocated with the malloc(), calloc() or realloc() family of functions in the implementation. Someone aware of this behavior might choose to map this problem to CWE-590 or to its parent, CWE-762, depending on their perspective.
참고 자료
REF-480
Valgrind
https://valgrind.org/ REF-1518
AddressSanitizer
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html
제출
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
출시일 |
Version |
| CWE Community |
|
2006-12-15 +00:00 |
2006-12-15 +00:00 |
Draft 5 |
수정 사항
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
댓글 |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Description, Relationships, Other_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-11-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-01-12 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Maintenance_Notes, Name, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-09-13 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-02-18 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-03-15 +00:00 |
updated Maintenance_Notes, Other_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-04-03 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-09-09 +00:00 |
updated Functional_Areas, References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, References, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-04-30 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description |