취약점 도입 방식
Architecture and Design
Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
적용 가능한 플랫폼
언어
클래스: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
기술
클래스: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)
일반적인 결과
| 범위 |
영향 |
가능성 |
Integrity Confidentiality Availability | Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
참고: Execution of arbitrary code in the context of usage of the resources with dangerous names. | |
Confidentiality Availability | Read Application Data, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
참고: Crash of the consumer code of these resources resulting in information leakage or denial of service. | |
잠재적 완화 방법
Phases : Architecture and Design
Do not allow users to control names of resources used on the server side.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Perform allowlist input validation at entry points and also before consuming the resources. Reject bad file names rather than trying to cleanse them.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Make sure that technologies consuming the resources are not vulnerable (e.g. buffer overflow, format string, etc.) in a way that would allow code execution if the name of the resource is malformed.
탐지 방법
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
취약점 매핑 메모
근거 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
제출
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
출시일 |
Version |
| Evgeny Lebanidze |
Cigital |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
Draft 8 |
수정 사항
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
댓글 |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-10-14 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-06-21 +00:00 |
updated Description, Name, Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-12-13 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-05-03 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Description, Enabling_Factors_for_Exploitation, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-06-25 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors |