취약점 도입 방식
Implementation
적용 가능한 플랫폼
언어
이름: C++ (Undetermined)
이름: C# (Undetermined)
이름: Java (Undetermined)
일반적인 결과
| 범위 |
영향 |
가능성 |
Integrity Confidentiality | Read Application Data, Modify Application Data
참고: Making a critical variable public allows anyone with access to the object in which the variable is contained to alter or read the value. | |
| Other | Reduce Maintainability
참고: This issue makes it more difficult to maintain the product, which indirectly affects security by making it more difficult or time-consuming to find and/or fix vulnerabilities. | |
관찰된 예시
| 참고 자료 |
설명 |
| variables declared public allow remote read of system properties such as user name and home directory. |
잠재적 완화 방법
Phases : Implementation
Data should be private, static, and final whenever possible. This will assure that your code is protected by instantiating early, preventing access, and preventing tampering.
탐지 방법
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
효과성 : High
취약점 매핑 메모
근거 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
참고 자료
REF-960
Automated Source Code Maintainability Measure (ASCMM)
Object Management Group (OMG).
https://www.omg.org/spec/ASCMM/
제출
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
출시일 |
Version |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-03-03 +00:00 |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
1.4 |
수정 사항
| 이름 |
조직 |
날짜 |
댓글 |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-12-28 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-12-13 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Likelihood_of_Exploit, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Name, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, References, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction, Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-10-26 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2024-02-29 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description |