Szczegóły CWE-472

CWE-472

External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter
Draft
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
2025-12-11
00h00 +00:00
CWE Mitre.org
Powiadomienia dla konkretnego CWE
Bądź na bieżąco z wszelkimi zmianami dotyczącymi konkretnego CWE.
Zarządzaj powiadomieniami

Nazwa: External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter

The web application does not sufficiently verify inputs that are assumed to be immutable but are actually externally controllable, such as hidden form fields.

Informacje ogólne

Sposoby wprowadzenia

Implementation : OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.

Odpowiednie platformy

Język

Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

Technologie

Class: Web Based (Undetermined)
Name: Web Server (Undetermined)

Typowe konsekwencje

Zakres Wpływ Prawdopodobieństwo
IntegrityModify Application Data

Note: Without appropriate protection mechanisms, the client can easily tamper with cookies and similar web data. Reliance on the cookies without detailed validation can lead to problems such as SQL injection. If you use cookie values for security related decisions on the server side, manipulating the cookies might lead to violations of security policies such as authentication bypassing, user impersonation and privilege escalation. In addition, storing sensitive data in the cookie without appropriate protection can also lead to disclosure of sensitive user data, especially data stored in persistent cookies.

Zaobserwowane przykłady

Odniesienia Opis

CVE-2002-0108

Forum product allows spoofed messages of other users via hidden form fields for name and e-mail address.

CVE-2000-0253

Shopping cart allows price modification via hidden form field.

CVE-2000-0254

Shopping cart allows price modification via hidden form field.

CVE-2000-0926

Shopping cart allows price modification via hidden form field.

CVE-2000-0101

Shopping cart allows price modification via hidden form field.

CVE-2000-0102

Shopping cart allows price modification via hidden form field.

CVE-2000-0758

Allows admin access by modifying value of form field.

CVE-2002-1880

Read messages by modifying message ID parameter.

CVE-2000-1234

Send email to arbitrary users by modifying email parameter.

CVE-2005-1652

Authentication bypass by setting a parameter.

CVE-2005-1784

Product does not check authorization for configuration change admin script, leading to password theft via modified e-mail address field.

CVE-2005-2314

Logic error leads to password disclosure.

CVE-2005-1682

Modification of message number parameter allows attackers to read other people's messages.

Potencjalne środki zaradcze

Phases : Implementation
Phases : Implementation
Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.

Metody wykrywania

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Skuteczność : High

Uwagi dotyczące mapowania podatności

Uzasadnienie : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Komentarz : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Powiązane wzorce ataków

CAPEC-ID Nazwa wzorca ataku
CAPEC-146 XML Schema Poisoning
An adversary corrupts or modifies the content of XML schema information passed between a client and server for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. XML Schemas provide the structure and content definitions for XML documents. Schema poisoning is the ability to manipulate a schema either by replacing or modifying it to compromise the programs that process documents that use this schema.
CAPEC-226 Session Credential Falsification through Manipulation
An attacker manipulates an existing credential in order to gain access to a target application. Session credentials allow users to identify themselves to a service after an initial authentication without needing to resend the authentication information (usually a username and password) with every message. An attacker may be able to manipulate a credential sniffed from an existing connection in order to gain access to a target server.
CAPEC-31 Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies
This attack relies on the use of HTTP Cookies to store credentials, state information and other critical data on client systems. There are several different forms of this attack. The first form of this attack involves accessing HTTP Cookies to mine for potentially sensitive data contained therein. The second form involves intercepting this data as it is transmitted from client to server. This intercepted information is then used by the adversary to impersonate the remote user/session. The third form is when the cookie's content is modified by the adversary before it is sent back to the server. Here the adversary seeks to convince the target server to operate on this falsified information.
CAPEC-39 Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data Tokens
In circumstances where an application holds important data client-side in tokens (cookies, URLs, data files, and so forth) that data can be manipulated. If client or server-side application components reinterpret that data as authentication tokens or data (such as store item pricing or wallet information) then even opaquely manipulating that data may bear fruit for an Attacker. In this pattern an attacker undermines the assumption that client side tokens have been adequately protected from tampering through use of encryption or obfuscation.

Notatki

This is a primary weakness for many other weaknesses and functional consequences, including XSS, SQL injection, path disclosure, and file inclusion.
This is a technology-specific MAID problem.

Odniesienia

REF-44

24 Deadly Sins of Software Security
Michael Howard, David LeBlanc, John Viega.

REF-62

The Art of Software Security Assessment
Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh.

Zgłoszenie

Nazwa Organizacja Data Data wydania Version
PLOVER 2006-07-19 +00:00 2006-07-19 +00:00 Draft 3

Modyfikacje

Nazwa Organizacja Data Komentarz
Sean Eidemiller Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 added/updated demonstrative examples
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Description, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-01-12 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-07-27 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-10-29 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Other_Notes, Relationship_Notes, Theoretical_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2010-04-05 +00:00 updated Related_Attack_Patterns
CWE Content Team MITRE 2010-12-13 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-03-29 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-27 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples, References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2015-12-07 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-01-03 +00:00 updated Related_Attack_Patterns
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-06-20 +00:00 updated Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-06-25 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2021-10-28 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Detection_Factors, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
Informacje prezentowane na CVE Find pochodzą z kilku starannie wybranych źródeł referencyjnych. Dane CVE są dostarczane przez MITRE Corporation i Narodową Bazę Podatności (NVD). Katalog znanych eksploatowanych podatności (KEV) pochodzi z Agencji ds. Bezpieczeństwa Cyberprzestrzeni i Infrastruktury (CISA), natomiast wyniki EPSS pochodzą z FIRST.org. Ponadto dane dotyczące słabości oprogramowania (CWE) i typowych wzorców ataków (CAPEC) są utrzymywane przez MITRE Corporation, a informacje o konfiguracjach sprzętu i oprogramowania (CPE) są dostarczane przez NVD.