CVE-2024-35909 : Chi tiết

CVE-2024-35909

5.5
/
Trung bình
0.03%V4
2024-05-19
08h35 +00:00
Local
2025-05-04
09h08 +00:00
Thông báo cho một CVE
Luôn được thông báo về mọi thay đổi đối với một CVE cụ thể.
Quản lý thông báo

Mô tả CVE

net: wwan: t7xx: Split 64bit accesses to fix alignment issues

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: wwan: t7xx: Split 64bit accesses to fix alignment issues Some of the registers are aligned on a 32bit boundary, causing alignment faults on 64bit platforms. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffc084a1d004 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000061 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x21: alignment fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000061, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000046ad6000 [ffffffc084a1d004] pgd=100000013ffff003, p4d=100000013ffff003, pud=100000013ffff003, pmd=0068000020a00711 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000061 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: mtk_t7xx(+) qcserial pppoe ppp_async option nft_fib_inet nf_flow_table_inet mt7921u(O) mt7921s(O) mt7921e(O) mt7921_common(O) iwlmvm(O) iwldvm(O) usb_wwan rndis_host qmi_wwan pppox ppp_generic nft_reject_ipv6 nft_reject_ipv4 nft_reject_inet nft_reject nft_redir nft_quota nft_numgen nft_nat nft_masq nft_log nft_limit nft_hash nft_flow_offload nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_tables nf_nat nf_flow_table nf_conntrack mt7996e(O) mt792x_usb(O) mt792x_lib(O) mt7915e(O) mt76_usb(O) mt76_sdio(O) mt76_connac_lib(O) mt76(O) mac80211(O) iwlwifi(O) huawei_cdc_ncm cfg80211(O) cdc_ncm cdc_ether wwan usbserial usbnet slhc sfp rtc_pcf8563 nfnetlink nf_reject_ipv6 nf_reject_ipv4 nf_log_syslog nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 mt6577_auxadc mdio_i2c libcrc32c compat(O) cdc_wdm cdc_acm at24 crypto_safexcel pwm_fan i2c_gpio i2c_smbus industrialio i2c_algo_bit i2c_mux_reg i2c_mux_pca954x i2c_mux_pca9541 i2c_mux_gpio i2c_mux dummy oid_registry tun sha512_arm64 sha1_ce sha1_generic seqiv md5 geniv des_generic libdes cbc authencesn authenc leds_gpio xhci_plat_hcd xhci_pci xhci_mtk_hcd xhci_hcd nvme nvme_core gpio_button_hotplug(O) dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_crypt dm_mod dax usbcore usb_common ptp aquantia pps_core mii tpm encrypted_keys trusted CPU: 3 PID: 5266 Comm: kworker/u9:1 Tainted: G O 6.6.22 #0 Hardware name: Bananapi BPI-R4 (DT) Workqueue: md_hk_wq t7xx_fsm_uninit [mtk_t7xx] pstate: 804000c5 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : t7xx_cldma_hw_set_start_addr+0x1c/0x3c [mtk_t7xx] lr : t7xx_cldma_start+0xac/0x13c [mtk_t7xx] sp : ffffffc085d63d30 x29: ffffffc085d63d30 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffffff80c804f2c0 x24: ffffff80ca196c05 x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffff80c814b9b8 x21: ffffff80c814b128 x20: 0000000000000001 x19: ffffff80c814b080 x18: 0000000000000014 x17: 0000000055c9806b x16: 000000007c5296d0 x15: 000000000f6bca68 x14: 00000000dbdbdce4 x13: 000000001aeaf72a x12: 0000000000000001 x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffffff80ca1ef6b4 x7 : ffffff80c814b818 x6 : 0000000000000018 x5 : 0000000000000870 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000010a947000 x1 : ffffffc084a1d004 x0 : ffffffc084a1d004 Call trace: t7xx_cldma_hw_set_start_addr+0x1c/0x3c [mtk_t7xx] t7xx_fsm_uninit+0x578/0x5ec [mtk_t7xx] process_one_work+0x154/0x2a0 worker_thread+0x2ac/0x488 kthread+0xe0/0xec ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Code: f9400800 91001000 8b214001 d50332bf (f9000022) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The inclusion of io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h indicates that all 64bit accesses can be replaced by pairs of nonatomic 32bit access. Fix alignment by forcing all accesses to be 32bit on 64bit platforms.

Thông tin CVE

Điểm yếu liên quan

CWE-ID Tên điểm yếu Nguồn
CWE Other Không có thông tin.

Số liệu

Số liệu Điểm Mức độ nghiêm trọng CVSS Vector Nguồn
V3.1 5.5 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS là mô hình tính điểm dự đoán khả năng một lỗ hổng bị khai thác.

Điểm EPSS

Mô hình EPSS tạo ra điểm xác suất từ 0 đến 1 (0 đến 100%). Điểm càng cao, xác suất một lỗ hổng bị khai thác càng lớn.

Phân vị EPSS

Phân vị được dùng để xếp hạng CVE theo điểm EPSS. Ví dụ, một CVE ở phân vị thứ 95 theo điểm EPSS có nhiều khả năng bị khai thác hơn 95% CVE khác. Do đó, phân vị được dùng để so sánh điểm EPSS của một CVE với các CVE khác.

Sản phẩm được đề cập

Cấu hình 0

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version Từ (bao gồm) 5.19 Đến (không bao gồm) 6.1.85

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version Từ (bao gồm) 6.2 Đến (không bao gồm) 6.6.26

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version Từ (bao gồm) 6.7 Đến (không bao gồm) 6.8.5

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 6.9

Tài liệu tham khảo