CVE-2024-9355 : Chi tiết

CVE-2024-9355

6.5
/
Trung bình
0.07%V4
2024-10-01
18h17 +00:00
Local
2026-11-05
12h15 +00:00
Thông báo cho một CVE
Luôn được thông báo về mọi thay đổi đối với một CVE cụ thể.
Quản lý thông báo

Mô tả CVE

Golang-fips: golang fips zeroed buffer

A vulnerability was found in Golang FIPS OpenSSL. This flaw allows a malicious user to randomly cause an uninitialized buffer length variable with a zeroed buffer to be returned in FIPS mode. It may also be possible to force a false positive match between non-equal hashes when comparing a trusted computed hmac sum to an untrusted input sum if an attacker can send a zeroed buffer in place of a pre-computed sum.  It is also possible to force a derived key to be all zeros instead of an unpredictable value.  This may have follow-on implications for the Go TLS stack.

Thông tin CVE

Điểm yếu liên quan

CWE-ID Tên điểm yếu Nguồn
CWE-457 Use of Uninitialized Variable
The code uses a variable that has not been initialized, leading to unpredictable or unintended results.

Số liệu

Số liệu Điểm Mức độ nghiêm trọng CVSS Vector Nguồn
V3.1 6.5 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

High

successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

Low

Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

EPSS

EPSS là mô hình tính điểm dự đoán khả năng một lỗ hổng bị khai thác.

Điểm EPSS

Mô hình EPSS tạo ra điểm xác suất từ 0 đến 1 (0 đến 100%). Điểm càng cao, xác suất một lỗ hổng bị khai thác càng lớn.

Phân vị EPSS

Phân vị được dùng để xếp hạng CVE theo điểm EPSS. Ví dụ, một CVE ở phân vị thứ 95 theo điểm EPSS có nhiều khả năng bị khai thác hơn 95% CVE khác. Do đó, phân vị được dùng để so sánh điểm EPSS của một CVE với các CVE khác.

Tài liệu tham khảo

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10133
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:7502
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:7550
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8327
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8678
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8847
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:9551
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2416
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7118
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7256
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7624
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:55520
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:55525
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59439
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:66016
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:68504
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:69235
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:90725
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:90726
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:92217
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9355
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315719
Tags : issue-tracking, x_refsource_REDHAT