CWE-104
Struts: Form Bean Does Not Extend Validation Class
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
00h00 +00:00
Thông báo cho một CWE
Luôn được thông báo về mọi thay đổi đối với một CWE cụ thể.
Tên: Struts: Form Bean Does Not Extend Validation Class
If a form bean does not extend an ActionForm subclass of the Validator framework, it can expose the application to other weaknesses related to insufficient input validation.
Thông tin chung
Chi tiết nền tảng
Các cách xuất hiện
ImplementationNền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Tên: Java (Undetermined)Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi | Tác động | Khả năng xảy ra |
|---|---|---|
| Other | Other Ghi chú: Bypassing the validation framework for a form exposes the application to numerous types of attacks. Unchecked input is an important component of vulnerabilities like cross-site scripting, process control, and SQL injection. | |
| Confidentiality Integrity Availability Other | Other Ghi chú: Although J2EE applications are not generally susceptible to memory corruption attacks, if a J2EE application interfaces with native code that does not perform array bounds checking, an attacker may be able to use an input validation mistake in the J2EE application to launch a buffer overflow attack. |
Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng
Phases : ImplementationEnsure that all forms extend one of the Validation Classes.
Phương pháp phát hiện
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)Hiệu quả : High
Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Tài liệu tham khảo
REF-6
Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security ErrorsKatrina Tsipenyuk, Brian Chess, Gary McGraw.
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/SevenPerniciousKingdoms.pdf
Gửi
| Tên | Tổ chức | Ngày | Ngày phát hành | Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Pernicious Kingdoms | Draft 3 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên | Tổ chức | Ngày | Bình luận |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Dalci | Cigital | updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings, Weakness_Ordinalities | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Background_Details, Common_Consequences, Other_Notes | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Common_Consequences, Other_Notes | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Demonstrative_Examples | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Common_Consequences | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Potential_Mitigations | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Causal_Nature, Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated References, Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Background_Details | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Detection_Factors, Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Mapping_Notes | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated References |
