Chi tiết nền tảng
Các cách xuất hiện
Architecture and Design
Implementation
Nền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Hệ điều hành
Lớp: Not OS-Specific (Undetermined)
Kiến trúc
Lớp: Not Architecture-Specific (Undetermined)
Công nghệ
Lớp: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)
Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi |
Tác động |
Khả năng xảy ra |
| Confidentiality | Read Application Data | High |
| Confidentiality | Read Memory | High |
| Authorization | Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands | High |
| Integrity | Modify Memory | High |
| Integrity | Modify Application Data | High |
| Access Control | Bypass Protection Mechanism | High |
Ví dụ đã quan sát
| Tài liệu tham khảo |
Mô tả |
| Chain: JTAG interface is not disabled (CWE-1191) during ROM code execution, introducing a race condition (CWE-362) to extract encryption keys |
Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng
Phases : Architecture and Design
If feasible, the manufacturer should disable the JTAG interface or implement authentication and authorization for the JTAG interface. If authentication logic is added, it should be resistant to timing attacks. Security-sensitive data stored in registers, such as keys, etc. should be cleared when entering debug mode.
Phương pháp phát hiện
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
Fuzzing
Tests that fuzz Debug and Test Interfaces should ensure that no access without appropriate authentication and authorization is possible.
Hiệu quả : Moderate
Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Mẫu tấn công liên quan
| ID CAPEC |
Tên mẫu tấn công |
| CAPEC-1 |
Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs
In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to. |
| CAPEC-180 |
Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels
An attacker exploits a weakness in the configuration of access controls and is able to bypass the intended protection that these measures guard against and thereby obtain unauthorized access to the system or network. Sensitive functionality should always be protected with access controls. However configuring all but the most trivial access control systems can be very complicated and there are many opportunities for mistakes. If an attacker can learn of incorrectly configured access security settings, they may be able to exploit this in an attack. |
Ghi chú
CWE-1191 and CWE-1244 both involve physical debug access,
but the weaknesses are different. CWE-1191 is effectively
about missing authorization for a debug interface,
i.e. JTAG. CWE-1244 is about providing internal assets with
the wrong debug access level, exposing the asset to
untrusted debug agents.
Tài liệu tham khảo
REF-1037
Attacks and Defenses for JTAG
Kurt Rosenfeld, Ramesh Karri.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5406671 REF-1043
Exploiting JTAG and Its Mitigation in IOT: A Survey
Gopal Vishwakarma, Wonjun Lee.
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/10/12/121/pdf REF-1084
JTAG Explained (finally!): Why "IoT", Software Security Engineers, and Manufacturers Should Care
Gopal Vishwakarma, Wonjun Lee.
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/10/12/121/pdf REF-1085
Design for Testability & Design for Debug
Bob Molyneaux, Mark McDermott, Anil Sabbavarapu.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180412225956/http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~mcdermot/vlsi-2/Lecture_17.pdf REF-1355
dmi_jtag.sv
Florian Zaruba.
https://github.com/HACK-EVENT/hackatdac21/blob/71103971e8204de6a61afc17d3653292517d32bf/piton/design/chip/tile/ariane/src/riscv-dbg/src/dmi_jtag.sv#L192:L204 REF-1354
Fix CWE-1191 in dmi_jtag.sv
Florian Zaruba.
https://github.com/HACK-EVENT/hackatdac21/blob/58f984d492fdb0369c82ef10fcbbaa4b9850f9fb/piton/design/chip/tile/ariane/src/riscv-dbg/src/dmi_jtag.sv#L200 REF-1353
Fix CWE-1191 in dmi_jtag.sv
Florian Zaruba.
https://github.com/HACK-EVENT/hackatdac21/blob/58f984d492fdb0369c82ef10fcbbaa4b9850f9fb/piton/design/chip/tile/ariane/src/riscv-dbg/src/dmi_jtag.sv#L131 REF-1352
dmi_jtag.sv
Florian Zaruba.
https://github.com/HACK-EVENT/hackatdac21/blob/71103971e8204de6a61afc17d3653292517d32bf/piton/design/chip/tile/ariane/src/riscv-dbg/src/dmi_jtag.sv#L118:L204 REF-1364
dmi_jtag.sv
https://github.com/HACK-EVENT/hackatdac21/blob/71103971e8204de6a61afc17d3653292517d32bf/piton/design/chip/tile/ariane/src/riscv-dbg/src/dmi_jtag.sv#L82 REF-1365
fix cwe_1205 in dmi_jtag.sv
https://github.com/HACK-EVENT/hackatdac21/blob/c4f4b832218b50c406dbf9f425d3b654117c1355/piton/design/chip/tile/ariane/src/riscv-dbg/src/dmi_jtag.sv#L158
Gửi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Ngày phát hành |
Version |
| Arun Kanuparthi, Hareesh Khattri, Parbati Kumar Manna, Narasimha Kumar V Mangipudi |
Intel Corporation |
2019-10-15 +00:00 |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
4.0 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Bình luận |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-06-25 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Name, References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-08-20 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Name, Potential_Mitigations, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-03-15 +00:00 |
updated Maintenance_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Detection_Factors, Maintenance_Notes, Name, Potential_Mitigations, Relationship_Notes, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2022-04-28 +00:00 |
updated Related_Attack_Patterns |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2022-10-13 +00:00 |
updated Description, Related_Attack_Patterns |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-10-26 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-09-09 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Background_Details, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Dimensions, Modes_of_Introduction |