Tên: Permissive List of Allowed Inputs

The product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are explicitly allowed by policy because the inputs are assumed to be safe, but the list is too permissive - that is, it allows an input that is unsafe, leading to resultant weaknesses.

Thông tin chung

Các cách xuất hiện

Implementation

Nền tảng áp dụng

Ngôn ngữ

Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

Công nghệ

Lớp: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)

Hậu quả phổ biến

Phạm vi	Tác động	Khả năng xảy ra
Access Control	Bypass Protection Mechanism

Ví dụ đã quan sát

Tài liệu tham khảo	Mô tả
CVE-2019-12799	Chain: bypass of untrusted deserialization issue (CWE-502) by using an assumed-trusted class (CWE-183)
CVE-2019-10458	CI/CD pipeline feature has unsafe elements in allowlist, allowing bypass of script restrictions
CVE-2017-1000095	Default allowlist includes unsafe methods, allowing bypass of sandbox

Phương pháp phát hiện

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Hiệu quả : High

Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng

Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Mẫu tấn công liên quan

ID CAPEC	Tên mẫu tấn công
CAPEC-120	Double Encoding The adversary utilizes a repeating of the encoding process for a set of characters (that is, character encoding a character encoding of a character) to obfuscate the payload of a particular request. This may allow the adversary to bypass filters that attempt to detect illegal characters or strings, such as those that might be used in traversal or injection attacks. Filters may be able to catch illegal encoded strings, but may not catch doubly encoded strings. For example, a dot (.), often used in path traversal attacks and therefore often blocked by filters, could be URL encoded as %2E. However, many filters recognize this encoding and would still block the request. In a double encoding, the % in the above URL encoding would be encoded again as %25, resulting in %252E which some filters might not catch, but which could still be interpreted as a dot (.) by interpreters on the target.
CAPEC-3	Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters Some APIs will strip certain leading characters from a string of parameters. An adversary can intentionally introduce leading "ghost" characters (extra characters that don't affect the validity of the request at the API layer) that enable the input to pass the filters and therefore process the adversary's input. This occurs when the targeted API will accept input data in several syntactic forms and interpret it in the equivalent semantic way, while the filter does not take into account the full spectrum of the syntactic forms acceptable to the targeted API.
CAPEC-43	Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: --> --> . In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-71	Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic An attacker may provide a Unicode string to a system component that is not Unicode aware and use that to circumvent the filter or cause the classifying mechanism to fail to properly understanding the request. That may allow the attacker to slip malicious data past the content filter and/or possibly cause the application to route the request incorrectly.

Tài liệu tham khảo

REF-62

The Art of Software Security Assessment
Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh.

Gửi

Tên	Tổ chức	Ngày	Ngày phát hành	Version
PLOVER		2006-07-19 +00:00	2006-07-19 +00:00	Draft 3

Sửa đổi

Tên	Tổ chức	Ngày	Bình luận
Eric Dalci	Cigital	2008-07-01 +00:00	updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2008-09-08 +00:00	updated Description, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2009-03-10 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2009-07-27 +00:00	updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2010-02-16 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-03-29 +00:00	updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-06-01 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2012-05-11 +00:00	updated References, Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2013-02-21 +00:00	updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2014-06-23 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2014-07-30 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2017-11-08 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2019-01-03 +00:00	updated Related_Attack_Patterns
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2019-06-20 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-02-24 +00:00	updated Alternate_Terms, Description, Observed_Examples, Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-06-25 +00:00	updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2021-10-28 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-04-27 +00:00	updated Detection_Factors, Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-06-29 +00:00	updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2025-12-11 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2026-10-28 +00:00	updated Observed_Examples

Chi tiết CWE-183

CWE-183