Các cách xuất hiện
Architecture and Design
Implementation
Nền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi |
Tác động |
Khả năng xảy ra |
| Access Control | Bypass Protection Mechanism | |
Ví dụ đã quan sát
| Tài liệu tham khảo |
Mô tả |
| Browser does not verify Basic Constraints of a certificate, even though it is required, allowing spoofing of trusted certificates. |
| Browser does not verify Basic Constraints of a certificate, even though it is required, allowing spoofing of trusted certificates. |
| Browser does not verify Basic Constraints of a certificate, even though it is required, allowing spoofing of trusted certificates. |
| Logic error prevents some required conditions from being enforced during Challenge-Response Authentication Mechanism with MD5 (CRAM-MD5). |
| Shared secret not verified in a RADIUS response packet, allowing authentication bypass by spoofing server replies. |
| Insufficient verification in VoIP implementation, in violation of standard, allows spoofed messages. |
| Insufficient verification in VoIP implementation, in violation of standard, allows spoofed messages. |
| Security check not applied to all components, allowing bypass. |
Phương pháp phát hiện
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Ghi chú
This is a "missing step" error on the product side, which can overlap weaknesses such as insufficient verification and spoofing. It is frequently found in cryptographic and authentication errors. It is sometimes resultant.
Gửi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Ngày phát hành |
Version |
| PLOVER |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Bình luận |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Modes_of_Introduction, Observed_Examples, Other_Notes, Relationship_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2015-12-07 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-06-20 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2022-04-28 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors |