Chi tiết CWE-392

CWE-392

Missing Report of Error Condition
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
Draft
2026-10-28
00h00 +00:00
CWE Mitre.org
Thông báo cho một CWE
Luôn được thông báo về mọi thay đổi đối với một CWE cụ thể.
Quản lý thông báo

Tên: Missing Report of Error Condition

The product encounters an error but does not provide a status code or return value to indicate that an error has occurred.

Thông tin chung

Các cách xuất hiện

Implementation

Nền tảng áp dụng

Ngôn ngữ

Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Tên: Python (Undetermined)

Hậu quả phổ biến

Phạm vi Tác động Khả năng xảy ra
Integrity
Other		Varies by Context, Unexpected State

Ghi chú: Errors that are not properly reported could place the system in an unexpected state that could lead to unintended behaviors.

Ví dụ đã quan sát

Tài liệu tham khảo Mô tả

CVE-2024-52316

Web-based product can throw an exception during authentication but does not report the failure in the HTTP status code, allowing authentication bypass.

[REF-1374]

Chain: JavaScript-based cryptocurrency library can fall back to the insecure Math.random() function instead of reporting a failure (CWE-392), thus reducing the entropy (CWE-332) and leading to generation of non-unique cryptographic keys for Bitcoin wallets (CWE-1391)

CVE-2004-0063

Function returns "OK" even if another function returns a different status code than expected, leading to accepting an invalid PIN number.

CVE-2002-1446

Error checking routine in PKCS#11 library returns "OK" status even when invalid signature is detected, allowing spoofed messages.

CVE-2002-0499

Kernel function truncates long pathnames without generating an error, leading to operation on wrong directory.

CVE-2005-2459

Function returns non-error value when a particular erroneous condition is encountered, leading to resultant NULL dereference.

Phương pháp phát hiện

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Hiệu quả : High

Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng

Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Tài liệu tham khảo

REF-1374

Randstorm: You Can't Patch a House of Cards
Unciphered.
https://www.unciphered.com/disclosure-of-vulnerable-bitcoin-wallet-library-2/

REF-1534

Automated Technical Debt Measure, Version 2
OMG.
https://www.omg.org/spec/ATDM2/1.0/PDF

REF-1541

Secure Coding Guide for Python
OpenSSF.
https://best.openssf.org/Secure-Coding-Guide-for-Python/

Gửi

Tên Tổ chức Ngày Ngày phát hành Version
PLOVER 2006-07-19 +00:00 2006-07-19 +00:00 Draft 3

Sửa đổi

Tên Tổ chức Ngày Bình luận
Sean Eidemiller Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 added/updated demonstrative examples
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-03-10 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-10-29 +00:00 updated Other_Notes, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team MITRE 2010-12-13 +00:00 updated Description, Name
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-27 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-01-03 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-08-20 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-12-10 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-10-26 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2024-02-29 +00:00 updated Observed_Examples, References
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-04-03 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-09-09 +00:00 updated References
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-04-30 +00:00 updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-10-28 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
Thông tin trình bày trên CVE Find đến từ nhiều nguồn tham chiếu được chọn lọc cẩn thận. Dữ liệu CVE được cung cấp bởi MITRE Corporation và Cơ sở dữ liệu lỗ hổng quốc gia (NVD). Danh mục lỗ hổng đã bị khai thác đã biết (KEV) có nguồn từ Cơ quan An ninh mạng và Cơ sở hạ tầng (CISA), trong khi điểm EPSS đến từ FIRST.org. Ngoài ra, dữ liệu về điểm yếu phần mềm (CWE) và mẫu tấn công phổ biến (CAPEC) được duy trì bởi MITRE Corporation, và thông tin về cấu hình phần cứng và phần mềm (CPE) được cung cấp bởi NVD.