Chi tiết nền tảng
Các cách xuất hiện
Array :
The product may use diagnostic methods that provide significant implementation details such as stack traces as part of its error handling mechanism.
Nền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Tên: Go (Undetermined)
Công nghệ
Lớp: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)
Lớp: Web Based (Undetermined)
Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi |
Tác động |
Khả năng xảy ra |
| Confidentiality | Read Application Data | |
Ví dụ đã quan sát
| Tài liệu tham khảo |
Mô tả |
| Code analysis product passes access tokens as a command-line parameter or through an environment variable, making them visible to other processes via the ps command. |
Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng
Phases : Architecture and Design // Implementation
Production applications should never use methods that generate internal details such as stack traces and error messages unless that information is directly committed to a log that is not viewable by the end user. All error message text should be HTML entity encoded before being written to the log file to protect against potential cross-site scripting attacks against the viewer of the logs
Phương pháp phát hiện
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Hiệu quả : High
Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Mẫu tấn công liên quan
| ID CAPEC |
Tên mẫu tấn công |
| CAPEC-170 |
Web Application Fingerprinting
An attacker sends a series of probes to a web application in order to elicit version-dependent and type-dependent behavior that assists in identifying the target. An attacker could learn information such as software versions, error pages, and response headers, variations in implementations of the HTTP protocol, directory structures, and other similar information about the targeted service. This information can then be used by an attacker to formulate a targeted attack plan. While web application fingerprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks. |
| CAPEC-694 |
System Location Discovery
|
Tài liệu tham khảo
REF-6
Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors
Katrina Tsipenyuk, Brian Chess, Gary McGraw.
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/SevenPerniciousKingdoms.pdf REF-1566
Golang Secure Coding Practices guide
OWASP.
https://github.com/OWASP/Go-SCP
Gửi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Ngày phát hành |
Version |
| 7 Pernicious Kingdoms |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Bình luận |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings, Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-03-10 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-07-27 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Description, Other_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-12-28 +00:00 |
updated Description, Name |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-09-13 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-05-03 +00:00 |
updated Related_Attack_Patterns |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-06-20 +00:00 |
updated Related_Attack_Patterns |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Description, Name, References, Relationships, Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-03-15 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2022-10-13 +00:00 |
updated Related_Attack_Patterns |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-10-26 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-04-03 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Background_Details, Common_Consequences, Description, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |