Các cách xuất hiện
Implementation
Nền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Tên: Java (Undetermined)
Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi |
Tác động |
Khả năng xảy ra |
| Confidentiality | Read Application Data
Ghi chú: Classes that do not explicitly deny serialization can be serialized by any other class, which can then in turn use the data stored inside it. The data can be accessed by serializing the class through another class. Alternately, an attacker can write out the class to a byte stream, then extract the important data from it. | |
Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng
Phases : Implementation
In Java, explicitly define final writeObject() to prevent serialization. This is the recommended solution. Define the writeObject() function to throw an exception explicitly denying serialization.
Phases : Implementation
Make sure to prevent serialization of your objects.
Phương pháp phát hiện
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Hiệu quả : High
Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Tài liệu tham khảo
REF-18
The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
Gửi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Ngày phát hành |
Version |
| CLASP |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Bình luận |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-07-27 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-03-15 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description |