CWE-55
Path Equivalence: '/./' (Single Dot Directory)
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
00h00 +00:00
Thông báo cho một CWE
Luôn được thông báo về mọi thay đổi đối với một CWE cụ thể.
Tên: Path Equivalence: '/./' (Single Dot Directory)
The product accepts path input in the form of single dot directory exploit ('/./') without appropriate validation, which can lead to ambiguous path resolution and allow an attacker to traverse the file system to unintended locations or access arbitrary files.
Thông tin chung
Các cách xuất hiện
ImplementationNền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi | Tác động | Khả năng xảy ra |
|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality Integrity | Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories |
Ví dụ đã quan sát
| Tài liệu tham khảo | Mô tả |
|---|---|
CVE-2024-6091 | Chain: AI agent platform does not restrict pathnames containing internal "/./" sequences (CWE-55), leading to an incomplete denylist (CWE-184) that does not prevent OS command injection (CWE-78) |
CVE-2000-0004 | Server allows remote attackers to read source code for executable files by inserting a . (dot) into the URL. |
CVE-2002-0304 | Server allows remote attackers to read password-protected files via a /./ in the HTTP request. |
CVE-1999-1083 | Possibly (could be a cleansing error) |
CVE-2004-0815 | "/./////etc" cleansed to ".///etc" then "/etc" |
CVE-2002-0112 | Server allows remote attackers to view password protected files via /./ in the URL. |
Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng
Phases : ImplementationInputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Gửi
| Tên | Tổ chức | Ngày | Ngày phát hành | Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLOVER | Draft 3 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên | Tổ chức | Ngày | Bình luận |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Dalci | Cigital | updated Time_of_Introduction | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Common_Consequences | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Observed_Examples, Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Potential_Mitigations | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Applicable_Platforms | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Potential_Mitigations | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Description | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Mapping_Notes | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Observed_Examples | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Affected_Resources, Functional_Areas | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Observed_Examples, Weakness_Ordinalities |
