Chi tiết CWE-552

CWE-552

Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
Draft
2026-10-28
00h00 +00:00
Thông báo cho một CWE
Luôn được thông báo về mọi thay đổi đối với một CWE cụ thể.
Quản lý thông báo

Tên: Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties

The product makes files or directories accessible to unauthorized actors, even though they should not be.

Thông tin chung

Các cách xuất hiện

Architecture and Design
Implementation : OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
Operation : OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
System Configuration : In cloud technologies and containers, this weakness might present itself in the form of misconfigured storage accounts that can be read or written by a public or anonymous user.

Nền tảng áp dụng

Ngôn ngữ

Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

Công nghệ

Lớp: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)
Lớp: Cloud Computing (Often)

Hậu quả phổ biến

Phạm vi Tác động Khả năng xảy ra
Confidentiality
Integrity
Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories

Ví dụ đã quan sát

Tài liệu tham khảo Mô tả

CVE-2005-1835

Data file under web root.

Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng

Phases : Implementation // System Configuration // Operation
When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to disable public access.

Phương pháp phát hiện

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Hiệu quả : High

Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng

Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Mẫu tấn công liên quan

ID CAPEC Tên mẫu tấn công
CAPEC-150 Collect Data from Common Resource Locations
An adversary exploits well-known locations for resources for the purposes of undermining the security of the target. In many, if not most systems, files and resources are organized in a default tree structure. This can be useful for adversaries because they often know where to look for resources or files that are necessary for attacks. Even when the precise location of a targeted resource may not be known, naming conventions may indicate a small area of the target machine's file tree where the resources are typically located. For example, configuration files are normally stored in the /etc director on Unix systems. Adversaries can take advantage of this to commit other types of attacks.
CAPEC-639 Probe System Files
An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to improperly protected files. If an application stores sensitive information in a file that is not protected by proper access control, then an adversary can access the file and search for sensitive information.

Tài liệu tham khảo

REF-1307

CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark version 1.5.0
Center for Internet Security.
https://www.cisecurity.org/benchmark/azure

REF-1327

CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark version 1.3.0
Center for Internet Security.
https://www.cisecurity.org/benchmark/google_cloud_computing_platform

Gửi

Tên Tổ chức Ngày Ngày phát hành Version
CWE Community 2006-07-19 +00:00 2006-07-19 +00:00 Draft 3

Sửa đổi

Tên Tổ chức Ngày Bình luận
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Time_of_Introduction
Veracode 2008-08-15 +00:00 Suggested OWASP Top Ten 2004 mapping
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-11-24 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-07-27 +00:00 updated Relationships
Veracode 2010-09-09 +00:00 Suggested OWASP Top Ten mapping
CWE Content Team MITRE 2010-09-27 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-09-13 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2015-12-07 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-01-19 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Affected_Resources, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-01-03 +00:00 updated Related_Attack_Patterns
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-06-20 +00:00 updated Related_Attack_Patterns
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Description, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-08-20 +00:00 updated Related_Attack_Patterns
CWE Content Team MITRE 2021-10-28 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Potential_Mitigations, References
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Detection_Factors, References, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-10-26 +00:00 updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-10-28 +00:00 updated Description, Modes_of_Introduction, Time_of_Introduction