Chi tiết nền tảng
Các cách xuất hiện
Architecture and Design : COMMISSION: This weakness refers to an incorrect design related to an architectural security tactic.
Implementation
Nền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Tên: Java (Undetermined)
Công nghệ
Lớp: Web Based (Undetermined)
Tên: Web Server (Undetermined)
Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi |
Tác động |
Khả năng xảy ra |
| Access Control | Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Ghi chú: A short session identifier leaves the application open to brute-force session guessing attacks. If an attacker can guess an authenticated user's session identifier, they can take over the user's session (called session hijacking). | |
Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng
Phases : Implementation
Session identifiers should have enough bits of entropy to make it more difficult to perform brute-force session guessing. The number of possible session IDs increases with increased session ID length, making it more difficult to guess or steal a session ID.
Phases : Implementation
A lower bound on the number of valid session identifiers that are available to be guessed is the number of users that are active on a site at any given moment. However, any users that abandon their sessions without logging out will increase this number. (This is one of many good reasons to have a short inactive session timeout.) With a 64 bit session identifier, assume 32 bits of entropy. For a large web site, assume that the attacker can try 1,000 guesses per second and that there are 10,000 valid session identifiers at any given moment. Given these assumptions, the expected time for an attacker to successfully guess a valid session identifier is less than 4 minutes. Now assume a 128 bit session identifier that provides 64 bits of entropy. With a very large web site, an attacker might try 10,000 guesses per second with 100,000 valid session identifiers available to be guessed. Given these assumptions, the expected time for an attacker to successfully guess a valid session identifier is greater than 292 years.
Phương pháp phát hiện
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Mẫu tấn công liên quan
| ID CAPEC |
Tên mẫu tấn công |
| CAPEC-21 |
Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers
|
| CAPEC-59 |
Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. |
Tài liệu tham khảo
REF-6
Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors
Katrina Tsipenyuk, Brian Chess, Gary McGraw.
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/SevenPerniciousKingdoms.pdf REF-482
Hold Your Sessions: An Attack on Java Session-id Generation
Zvi Gutterman.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/gm05.pdf
Gửi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Ngày phát hành |
Version |
| 7 Pernicious Kingdoms |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Bình luận |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-10-14 +00:00 |
updated Background_Details, Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Description, Other_Notes, References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Background_Details, Common_Consequences, Enabling_Factors_for_Exploitation, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-06-21 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Description, Enabling_Factors_for_Exploitation, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Background_Details, Common_Consequences, Description, Detection_Factors, Functional_Areas, Potential_Mitigations, References |