Các cách xuất hiện
Architecture and Design
Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
Nền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Công nghệ
Lớp: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)
Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi |
Tác động |
Khả năng xảy ra |
Integrity Confidentiality Availability | Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Ghi chú: Execution of arbitrary code in the context of usage of the resources with dangerous names. | |
Confidentiality Availability | Read Application Data, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Ghi chú: Crash of the consumer code of these resources resulting in information leakage or denial of service. | |
Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng
Phases : Architecture and Design
Do not allow users to control names of resources used on the server side.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Perform allowlist input validation at entry points and also before consuming the resources. Reject bad file names rather than trying to cleanse them.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Make sure that technologies consuming the resources are not vulnerable (e.g. buffer overflow, format string, etc.) in a way that would allow code execution if the name of the resource is malformed.
Phương pháp phát hiện
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Gửi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Ngày phát hành |
Version |
| Evgeny Lebanidze |
Cigital |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
Draft 8 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Bình luận |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-10-14 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-06-21 +00:00 |
updated Description, Name, Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-12-13 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-05-03 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Description, Enabling_Factors_for_Exploitation, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-06-25 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors |