Các cách xuất hiện
Architecture and Design
Implementation
Operation
Nền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi |
Tác động |
Khả năng xảy ra |
| Access Control | Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Ghi chú: An attacker may be able to elevate privileges. | |
| Confidentiality | Read Application Data
Ghi chú: An attacker may be able to obtain sensitive information. | |
Integrity Confidentiality Availability | Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Ghi chú: An attacker may be able to execute code. | |
Ví dụ đã quan sát
| Tài liệu tham khảo |
Mô tả |
| A Unix utility that displays online help files, if installed setuid, could allow a local attacker to gain privileges when a particular file-opening function is called. |
Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng
Phases : Implementation
Before calling privileged APIs, always ensure that the assumptions made by the privileged code hold true prior to making the call.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Know architecture and implementation weaknesses of the privileged APIs and make sure to account for these weaknesses before calling the privileged APIs to ensure that they can be called safely.
Phases : Implementation
If privileged APIs make certain assumptions about data, context or state validity that are passed by the caller, the calling code must ensure that these assumptions have been validated prior to making the call.
Phases : Implementation
If privileged APIs do not shed their privilege prior to returning to the calling code, then calling code needs to shed these privileges immediately and safely right after the call to the privileged APIs. In particular, the calling code needs to ensure that a privileged thread of execution will never be returned to the user or made available to user-controlled processes.
Phases : Implementation
Only call privileged APIs from safe, consistent and expected state.
Phases : Implementation
Ensure that a failure or an error will not leave a system in a state where privileges are not properly shed and privilege escalation is possible (i.e. fail securely with regards to handling of privileges).
Phương pháp phát hiện
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Mẫu tấn công liên quan
| ID CAPEC |
Tên mẫu tấn công |
| CAPEC-107 |
Cross Site Tracing
Cross Site Tracing (XST) enables an adversary to steal the victim's session cookie and possibly other authentication credentials transmitted in the header of the HTTP request when the victim's browser communicates to a destination system's web server. |
| CAPEC-234 |
Hijacking a privileged process
An adversary gains control of a process that is assigned elevated privileges in order to execute arbitrary code with those privileges. Some processes are assigned elevated privileges on an operating system, usually through association with a particular user, group, or role. If an attacker can hijack this process, they will be able to assume its level of privilege in order to execute their own code. |
Gửi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Ngày phát hành |
Version |
| Evgeny Lebanidze |
Cigital |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
Draft 8 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên |
Tổ chức |
Ngày |
Bình luận |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-10-14 +00:00 |
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Name, Related_Attack_Patterns |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-04-05 +00:00 |
updated Related_Attack_Patterns |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-12-13 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-03-29 +00:00 |
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Enabling_Factors_for_Exploitation, Observed_Examples, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2018-03-27 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors |