Tên: Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types

When converting from one data type to another, such as long to integer, data can be omitted or translated in a way that produces unexpected values. If the resulting values are used in a sensitive context, then dangerous behaviors may occur.

Thông tin chung

Các cách xuất hiện

Implementation

Nền tảng áp dụng

Ngôn ngữ

Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Tên: C (Undetermined)
Tên: Python (Undetermined)

Công nghệ

Lớp: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)

Hậu quả phổ biến

Phạm vi	Tác động	Khả năng xảy ra
Other Integrity	Unexpected State, Quality Degradation Ghi chú: The program could wind up using the wrong number and generate incorrect results. If the number is used to allocate resources or make a security decision, then this could introduce a vulnerability.

Ví dụ đã quan sát

Tài liệu tham khảo	Mô tả
CVE-2022-2639	Chain: integer coercion error (CWE-192) prevents a return value from indicating an error, leading to out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)
CVE-2021-43537	Chain: in a web browser, an unsigned 64-bit integer is forcibly cast to a 32-bit integer (CWE-681) and potentially leading to an integer overflow (CWE-190). If an integer overflow occurs, this can cause heap memory corruption (CWE-122)
CVE-2007-4268	Chain: integer signedness error (CWE-195) passes signed comparison, leading to heap overflow (CWE-122)
CVE-2007-4988	Chain: signed short width value in image processor is sign extended during conversion to unsigned int, which leads to integer overflow and heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2009-0231	Integer truncation of length value leads to heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2008-3282	Size of a particular type changes for 64-bit platforms, leading to an integer truncation in document processor causes incorrect index to be generated.

Các biện pháp giảm thiểu tiềm năng

Phases : Implementation
Avoid making conversion between numeric types. Always check for the allowed ranges.

Phương pháp phát hiện

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Hiệu quả : High

Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng

Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Tài liệu tham khảo

REF-962

Automated Source Code Security Measure (ASCSM)
Object Management Group (OMG).
http://www.omg.org/spec/ASCSM/1.0/

REF-1534

Automated Technical Debt Measure, Version 2
OMG.
https://www.omg.org/spec/ATDM2/1.0/PDF

REF-1541

Secure Coding Guide for Python
OpenSSF.
https://best.openssf.org/Secure-Coding-Guide-for-Python/

Gửi

Tên	Tổ chức	Ngày	Ngày phát hành	Version
CWE Community		2008-04-11 +00:00	2008-04-11 +00:00	Draft 9

Sửa đổi

Tên	Tổ chức	Ngày	Bình luận
Sean Eidemiller	Cigital	2008-07-01 +00:00	added/updated demonstrative examples
Eric Dalci	Cigital	2008-07-01 +00:00	updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2008-09-08 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2008-11-24 +00:00	updated Description, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2009-12-28 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms, Likelihood_of_Exploit, Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2010-02-16 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-03-29 +00:00	updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-06-01 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-06-27 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences, Observed_Examples, Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-09-13 +00:00	updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2012-05-11 +00:00	updated Demonstrative_Examples, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2014-07-30 +00:00	updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2017-11-08 +00:00	updated Likelihood_of_Exploit, Observed_Examples, Taxonomy_Mappings, Type
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2019-01-03 +00:00	updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2019-06-20 +00:00	updated Relationships, Type
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-02-24 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-08-20 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-12-10 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2021-03-15 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-04-27 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-06-29 +00:00	updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-10-26 +00:00	updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2024-02-29 +00:00	updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2025-04-03 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2025-12-11 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2026-10-28 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

Chi tiết CWE-681

CWE-681