CWE-705
Incorrect Control Flow Scoping
2008-09-09
00h00 +00:00
00h00 +00:00
Thông báo cho một CWE
Luôn được thông báo về mọi thay đổi đối với một CWE cụ thể.
Tên: Incorrect Control Flow Scoping
The product does not properly return control flow to the proper location after it has completed a task or detected an unusual condition.
Thông tin chung
Các cách xuất hiện
ImplementationNền tảng áp dụng
Ngôn ngữ
Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)Hậu quả phổ biến
| Phạm vi | Tác động | Khả năng xảy ra |
|---|---|---|
| Other | Alter Execution Logic, Other |
Ví dụ đã quan sát
| Tài liệu tham khảo | Mô tả |
|---|---|
CVE-2023-21087 | Java code in a smartphone OS can encounter a "boot loop" due to an uncaught exception |
CVE-2014-1266 | Chain: incorrect "goto" in Apple SSL product bypasses certificate validation, allowing Adversary-in-the-Middle (AITM) attack (Apple "goto fail" bug). CWE-705 (Incorrect Control Flow Scoping) -> CWE-561 (Dead Code) -> CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation) -> CWE-393 (Return of Wrong Status Code) -> CWE-300 (Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint). The code's whitespace indentation did not reflect the actual control flow (CWE-1114) and did not explicitly delimit the block (CWE-483), which could have made it more difficult for human code auditors to detect the vulnerability. |
Phương pháp phát hiện
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng
Lý do : This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriateBình luận : Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit
Gửi
| Tên | Tổ chức | Ngày | Ngày phát hành | Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | 1.0 |
Sửa đổi
| Tên | Tổ chức | Ngày | Bình luận |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Dalci | Cigital | updated Time_of_Introduction | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Observed_Examples | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Observed_Examples, Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Observed_Examples | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Description | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Time_of_Introduction | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Mapping_Notes | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships |
