Chi tiết CWE-780

The product uses the RSA algorithm but does not incorporate Optimal Asymmetric Encryption Padding (OAEP).

Chi tiết nền tảng

Các cách xuất hiện

Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.

Nền tảng áp dụng

Ngôn ngữ

Lớp: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

Hậu quả phổ biến

Phương pháp phát hiện

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Hiệu quả : High

Ghi chú ánh xạ lỗ hổng

Lý do : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Bình luận : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Ghi chú

This entry could probably have a new parent related to improper padding, however the role of padding in cryptographic algorithms can vary, such as hiding the length of the plaintext and providing additional random bits for the cipher. In general, cryptographic problems in CWE are not well organized and further research is needed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

REF-694

RSA Problem
Ronald L. Rivest, Burt Kaliski.
https://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/pubs/RK03.prepub.pdf

REF-695

Optimal Asymmetric Encryption Padding
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_asymmetric_encryption_padding

Gửi

Sửa đổi