CVE-2011-5073:詳細資料

CVE-2011-5073

0.42%V4
2012-01-29
11h00 +00:00
Cross-site Scripting
A03-Injection
Network
2024-09-17
04h03 +00:00
指定 CVE 通知
掌握特定 CVE 的任何變更。
管理通知

CVE 描述

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Support Incident Tracker (aka SiT!) before 3.65 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) mode parameter to contact_support.php; (2) contractid parameter to contract_add_service.php; (3) user parameter to edit_backup_users.php; (4) id parameter to edit_escalation_path.php; the Referer to (5) forgotpwd.php, (6) an approvalpage action to billable_incidents.php, or (7) transactions.php; (8) action parameter to inbox.php; (9) search_string parameter in a findcontact action to incident_add.php; table1 parameter to (10) report_customers.php, (11) report_incidents_by_engineer.php, (12) report_incidents_by_site.php, or (13) report_marketing.php; or the (14) startdate or (15) enddate parameter to report_incidents_by_vendor.php.

CVE 資訊

相關弱點

CWE-ID 弱點名稱 來源
CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

指標

指標 評分 嚴重程度 CVSS 向量 來源
V2 4.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS 是一種預測漏洞被利用可能性的評分模型。

EPSS 評分

EPSS 模型產生介於 0 到 1(0% 到 100%)之間的概率分數。分數越高,漏洞被利用的概率越大。

EPSS 百分位數

百分位數用於根據 EPSS 分數對 CVE 進行排名。例如,EPSS 評分在第 95 百分位的 CVE 比 95% 的其他 CVE 更有可能被利用。因此,百分位數用於比較某 CVE 的 EPSS 分數與其他 CVE 的相對位置。

漏洞利用資訊

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 18444

發布日期 : 2012-01-31 23h00 +00:00
作者 : High-Tech Bridge SA
EDB 已驗證 : Yes

相關產品

設定 0

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 至(含) 3.64

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.6

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.21

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.22

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.22pl1

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.23

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.24

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.24

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.30

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.30

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.31

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.32

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.33

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.35

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.35

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.36

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.40

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.40

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.41

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.45

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.45

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.50

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.50

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.51

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.60

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.61

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.62

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.63

Sitracker>>Support_incident_tracker >> Version 3.63

參考資料

http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/519636
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
http://secunia.com/advisories/46019
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA