CVE-2026-44522
0.63%V4
2026-05-14
19h16 +00:00
19h16 +00:00
指定 CVE 通知
掌握特定 CVE 的任何變更。
CVE 描述
Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. From 0.13.0 to before 0.19.4, the Note Mark application allows authenticated users to upload assets to notes via POST /api/notes/{noteID}/assets, where the asset filename is provided through the X-Name HTTP request header. This value is stored directly in the database without any sanitization or validation - no path separator filtering, no directory traversal sequence rejection, and no use of filepath.Base() to strip directory components. The unsanitized name is persisted as-is in the note_assets table (Name column, varchar(80)). When an administrator subsequently runs the data export CLI commands (note-mark migrate export-v1 or note-mark migrate export), the stored asset name is passed directly into filepath.Join() and path.Join() calls as part of the output file path argument to os.Create(). Since Go's filepath.Join() resolves ../ sequences during path normalization, an attacker-controlled asset name containing directory traversal sequences causes the export process to write files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem, completely outside the intended export directory. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.19.4.
CVE 資訊
相關弱點
| 弱點名稱 | 來源 | |
|---|---|---|
| Improper Input Validation The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. |
||
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. |
EPSS
EPSS 是一種預測漏洞被利用可能性的評分模型。
EPSS 評分
EPSS 模型產生介於 0 到 1（0% 到 100%）之間的概率分數。分數越高，漏洞被利用的概率越大。
EPSS 百分位數
百分位數用於根據 EPSS 分數對 CVE 進行排名。例如，EPSS 評分在第 95 百分位的 CVE 比 95% 的其他 CVE 更有可能被利用。因此，百分位數用於比較某 CVE 的 EPSS 分數與其他 CVE 的相對位置。
