CVE-2026-45297
0.04%V4
2026-05-28
18h16 +00:00
18h16 +00:00
指定 CVE 通知
掌握特定 CVE 的任何變更。
CVE 描述
OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch. ProjectAuthorizer.__call__ (OSS api/auth/auth_project.py:14-38 and EE ee/api/auth/auth_project.py:14-46) only runs projects.is_authorized(project_id, tenant_id, user_id) + projects.get_project(tenant_id, project_id) when self.project_identifier == "projectId" (camelCase). For EE multi-tenant, feature-flag queries only filter on project_id, never tenant_id. Any authenticated user in tenant A can read/update/delete feature-flag rows belonging to tenant B by iterating the sequential integer project_id + feature_flag_id. OSS is single-tenant by design ({"errors":["tenants already registered"]} on second signup) so there's no cross-tenant impact This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0.
CVE 資訊
相關弱點
| 弱點名稱 | 來源 | |
|---|---|---|
| Improper Authorization The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. |
||
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. |
||
| Incorrect Authorization The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. |
EPSS
EPSS 是一種預測漏洞被利用可能性的評分模型。
EPSS 評分
EPSS 模型產生介於 0 到 1（0% 到 100%）之間的概率分數。分數越高，漏洞被利用的概率越大。
EPSS 百分位數
百分位數用於根據 EPSS 分數對 CVE 進行排名。例如，EPSS 評分在第 95 百分位的 CVE 比 95% 的其他 CVE 更有可能被利用。因此，百分位數用於比較某 CVE 的 EPSS 分數與其他 CVE 的相對位置。
