CWE-1265 詳細資料

CWE-1265

Unintended Reentrant Invocation of Non-reentrant Code Via Nested Calls
2020-02-24
00h00 +00:00
Draft
2026-10-28
00h00 +00:00
指定 CWE 通知
掌握特定 CWE 的任何變更。
管理通知

名稱: Unintended Reentrant Invocation of Non-reentrant Code Via Nested Calls

The product invokes code that is believed to be reentrant, but the code performs a call that unintentionally produces a nested invocation of non-reentrant code.

CWE 描述

In a complex product, a single function call may lead to many different possible code paths, some of which may involve deeply nested calls. It may be difficult to foresee all possible code paths that could emanate from a given function call, even if that call is assumed to be reentrant. In some systems, an external actor can manipulate inputs to the system and thereby achieve a wide range of possible control flows. This is frequently a concern in products that execute scripts from untrusted sources. Examples of such products are web browsers and PDF readers. A weakness is present when one of the possible code paths resulting from a function call alters program state that the original caller assumes to be unchanged during the call.

一般資訊

引入方式

Implementation

適用平台

程式語言

類別: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

技術

類別: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)

常見後果

範圍 影響 可能性
IntegrityUnexpected State

注意:Exploitation of this weakness can leave the application in an unexpected state and cause variables to be reassigned before the first invocation has completed. This may eventually result in memory corruption or unexpected code execution.
Unknown

觀察到的案例

參考資料 描述

CVE-2014-1772

In this vulnerability, by registering a malicious onerror handler, an adversary can produce unexpected re-entrance of a CDOMRange object. [REF-1098]

CVE-2018-8174

This CVE covers several vulnerable scenarios enabled by abuse of the Class_Terminate feature in Microsoft VBScript. In one scenario, Class_Terminate is used to produce an undesirable re-entrance of ScriptingDictionary during execution of that object's destructor. In another scenario, a vulnerable condition results from a recursive entrance of a property setter method. This recursive invocation produces a second, spurious call to the Release method of a reference-counted object, causing a UAF when that object is freed prematurely. This vulnerability pattern has been popularized as "Double Kill". [REF-1099]

潛在緩解措施

Phases : Architecture and Design
When architecting a system that will execute untrusted code in response to events, consider executing the untrusted event handlers asynchronously (asynchronous message passing) as opposed to executing them synchronously at the time each event fires. The untrusted code should execute at the start of the next iteration of the thread's message loop. In this way, calls into non-reentrant code are strictly serialized, so that each operation completes fully before the next operation begins. Special attention must be paid to all places where type coercion may result in script execution. Performing all needed coercions at the very beginning of an operation can help reduce the chance of operations executing at unexpected junctures.
Phases : Implementation
Make sure the code (e.g., function or class) in question is reentrant by not leveraging non-local data, not modifying its own code, and not calling other non-reentrant code.

漏洞對應備注

理由說明 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
備註 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

相關攻擊模式

CAPEC ID 攻擊模式名稱
CAPEC-74 Manipulating State

參考資料

REF-1098

Root Cause Analysis of CVE-2014-1772 - An Internet Explorer Use After Free Vulnerability
Jack Tang.
https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research.html

REF-1099

It's Time To Terminate The Terminator
Simon Zuckerbraun.
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2018/5/15/its-time-to-terminate-the-terminator

提交

名稱 機構 日期 發布日期 Version
Simon Zuckerbraun Trend Micro 2018-12-20 +00:00 2020-02-24 +00:00 4.1

修改記錄

名稱 機構 日期 備註
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-08-20 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns
CWE Content Team MITRE 2022-10-13 +00:00 updated References
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Description, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-10-28 +00:00 updated Description